Re: CoC loving Linux programmers swear the GPLv2 is irrevocable. They are wrong. (As are the women they wish to empower).

[vnsndalce]

Band together as a Bloc and take action together. (Bloc revocation).
One practice note: do not send a cease-and-desist before-hand.
Do not let your lawyer send a cease-and-desist before-hand.
If a potential defendant knows that their liberties regarding a 
copyrighted work is in question
from entity X (entity X being a rights-holder etc), then they can rush 
to the courthouse
and file for a hearing to determine their rights.

They do this to give you less time to prepare your case, and to have the 
case start in
a jurisdiction that they feel is favorable to them (the CoC supporters 
will be trying
to get the case adjudicated in the 9th circuit, as they feel they have 
those
judges in their pocket - the 9th circuit absolutely hates men with a 
passion _even_
greater than the rest of America - and they like to overturn and ignore
black-letter law)

You will notice that the CoC supporters and No-Rescind group have fallen 
silent
in the last couple of months. They know they have very little to grasp 
onto,
and every one of their claims have been refuted.

Heather Meekers just gives the issue a gloss and says "lol no"
and points to a ZDnet article, where I have cited academic papers on the 
issue,
as-well as the law I learned in law school, and further studies.

Bruce Perens literally called you all replaceable.
As did Mathew Garret.
Specifically because they feel that they own your property now and they 
do not need you.

Inform them that such is not the case, in the most direct manner.

Remember: These are the people, the class, that prevent you from having 
sweet love.
They are those who uphold your legal disabilities (cannot marry cute 
young girls, as YHWH allows).
They are your enemies, and the enemies of all Men on earth.

On 2018-12-31 08:45, Ivan Ivanov wrote:
> Thank you very much for this message, friend. We the people should
> learn it and stop taking Cock of Conduct up our ass
>
> ÐÐ, 31 ÐÐÐ. 2018 Ð. Ð 05:07, <vnsndalce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > Their take is that if you lent (licensed) them a lawnmower and told 
> > them
> > not to wreck it, the fact that they did not wreck it entitles them to
> > keep the lawnmower forever(they followed your instruction regarding 
> > the
> > use of your property: "thus consideration, thus irrevocable license").
> >
> > They are wrong. You can revoke the license.
> >
> > You were paid nothing for this grant.
> > The takers have nothing.
> >
> > Yet they are taking your positions, your seniority, controlling your
> > speech, and ejecting you from your communities.
> >
> > You must fight back. They have already taken from you all the natural
> > pleasures in life (which include pretty young girls as brides, ruling
> > over your girls and family, being the master - not the servant of the
> > woman and her state).
> >
> > Now they are taking this edifice, this refuge, which you have built 
> > for
> > yourself.
> >
> > They see you as replaceable, expendable, removable employees.
> > (See: Bruce Perens statements on slashdot and this and other mailing
> > lists about how those who do not like the Code of Conduct can be 
> > easily
> > replaced)
> >
> > But you are property owners and may elect to enforce your rights as
> > such. And you should do so.
> >
> > And yes, You can trust my words. I am a licensed attorney, and I'm on
> > your side. Not the side of the women. Not the side of people like 
> > Bruce
> > Perens who see you as a replaceable cog: a worker... a chattel. Your
> > side. The side of the dispossessed men who are ruled over by the women
> > and the supporters of the women: who will not tolerate any corner of
> > advertence not fixated on them.