Re: [PATCH] base: fix a missing check of clk_prepare

[Pavel Machek]

On Tue 2019-01-01 21:13:01, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 6:25 PM Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed 2018-12-26 10:37:54, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 3:47 AM Kangjie Lu <kjlu@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > clk_prepare() could fail, so let's check its status, and if it fails,
> > > > issue an error message.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Kangjie Lu <kjlu@xxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c | 4 +++-
> > > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c b/drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c
> > > > index 5a42ae4078c2..cb6144fb24e2 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c
> > > > @@ -65,7 +65,9 @@ static void pm_clk_acquire(struct device *dev, struct pm_clock_entry *ce)
> > > >         if (IS_ERR(ce->clk)) {
> > > >                 ce->status = PCE_STATUS_ERROR;
> > > >         } else {
> > > > -               clk_prepare(ce->clk);
> > > > +               if (clk_prepare(ce->clk))
> > > > +                       dev_err(dev, "clk_prepare failed.\n");
> > >
> > > I'm not sure that this is useful.  The code continues regardless of
> > > the error anyway and it should at least set ce->status to
> > > PCE_STATUS_ERROR in the failing case.
> >
> > Maybe this is not complete fix, but dev_err() is preferable to silent
> > failure.
> 
> Preferable to you I suppose?

Preferable to the poor person trying to figure out why his machine
does not work?
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature