Re: [PATCH v4 05/10] KVM/x86: expose MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES to the guest

From: Wei Wang
Date: Thu Jan 03 2019 - 02:55:29 EST


On 01/03/2019 07:40 AM, Jim Mattson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 2:01 AM Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Bits [0, 5] of MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES tell about the format of
the addresses stored in the LBR stack. Expose those bits to the guest
when the guest lbr feature is enabled.

Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h | 2 ++
arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 9 +++++++++
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
index 2f82795..eee09b7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
@@ -87,6 +87,8 @@
#define ARCH_PERFMON_BRANCH_MISSES_RETIRED 6
#define ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTS_COUNT 7

+#define X86_PERF_CAP_MASK_LBR_FMT 0x3f
+
/*
* Intel "Architectural Performance Monitoring" CPUID
* detection/enumeration details:
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
index 7bcfa61..3b8a57b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
@@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ static inline int __do_cpuid_ent(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry, u32 function,
F(XMM3) | F(PCLMULQDQ) | 0 /* DTES64, MONITOR */ |
0 /* DS-CPL, VMX, SMX, EST */ |
0 /* TM2 */ | F(SSSE3) | 0 /* CNXT-ID */ | 0 /* Reserved */ |
- F(FMA) | F(CX16) | 0 /* xTPR Update, PDCM */ |
+ F(FMA) | F(CX16) | 0 /* xTPR Update*/ | F(PDCM) |
F(PCID) | 0 /* Reserved, DCA */ | F(XMM4_1) |
F(XMM4_2) | F(X2APIC) | F(MOVBE) | F(POPCNT) |
0 /* Reserved*/ | F(AES) | F(XSAVE) | 0 /* OSXSAVE */ | F(AVX) |
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index 8d5d984..ee02967 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -4161,6 +4161,13 @@ static int vmx_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
return 1;
msr_info->data = vcpu->arch.ia32_xss;
break;
+ case MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES:
+ if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PDCM))
+ return 1;
+ msr_info->data = native_read_msr(MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES);
Since this isn't guarded by vcpu->kvm->arch.lbr_in_guest, it breaks
backwards compatibility, doesn't it?

Right, thanks. Probably better to change it to below:

msr_info->data = 0;
data = native_read_msr(MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES);
if (vcpu->kvm->arch.lbr_in_guest)
msr_info->data |= (data & X86_PERF_CAP_MASK_LBR_FMT);

Best,
Wei