Re: [PATCH v3] mm/page_owner: fix for deferred struct page init
From: Michal Hocko
Date: Thu Jan 03 2019 - 06:51:20 EST
On Thu 20-12-18 15:31:56, Qian Cai wrote:
> When booting a system with "page_owner=on",
>
> start_kernel
> page_ext_init
> invoke_init_callbacks
> init_section_page_ext
> init_page_owner
> init_early_allocated_pages
> init_zones_in_node
> init_pages_in_zone
> lookup_page_ext
> page_to_nid
>
> The issue here is that page_to_nid() will not work since some page
> flags have no node information until later in page_alloc_init_late() due
> to DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT. Hence, it could trigger an out-of-bounds
> access with an invalid nid.
>
> [ 8.666047] UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in ./include/linux/mm.h:1104:50
> [ 8.672603] index 7 is out of range for type 'zone [5]'
>
> Also, kernel will panic since flags were poisoned earlier with,
>
> CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_PGFLAGS=y
> CONFIG_NODE_NOT_IN_PAGE_FLAGS=n
>
> start_kernel
> setup_arch
> pagetable_init
> paging_init
> sparse_init
> sparse_init_nid
> memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw
>
> Although later it tries to set page flags for pages in reserved bootmem
> regions,
>
> mm_init
> mem_init
> memblock_free_all
> free_low_memory_core_early
> reserve_bootmem_region
>
> there could still have some freed pages from the page allocator but yet
> to be initialized due to DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT. It have already been
> dealt with a bit in page_ext_init().
>
> * Take into account DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT.
> */
> if (early_pfn_to_nid(pfn) != nid)
> continue;
>
> However, it did not handle it well in init_pages_in_zone() which end up
> calling page_to_nid().
>
> [ 11.917212] page:ffffea0004200000 is uninitialized and poisoned
> [ 11.917220] raw: ffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffff
> ffffffffffffffff
> [ 11.921745] raw: ffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffff
> ffffffffffffffff
> [ 11.924523] page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PagePoisoned(p))
> [ 11.926498] page_owner info is not active (free page?)
> [ 12.329560] kernel BUG at include/linux/mm.h:990!
> [ 12.337632] RIP: 0010:init_page_owner+0x486/0x520
>
> Since there is no other routines depend on page_ext_init() in
> start_kernel(), just move it after page_alloc_init_late() to ensure that
> there is no deferred pages need to de dealt with. If deselected
> DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT, it is still better to call page_ext_init()
> earlier, so page owner could catch more early page allocation call
> sites. This gives us a good compromise between catching good and bad
> call sites (See the v1 patch [1]) in case of DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181220060303.38686-1-cai@xxxxxx/
>
> Fixes: fe53ca54270 (mm: use early_pfn_to_nid in page_ext_init)
> Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@xxxxxx>
> ---
>
> v3: still call page_ext_init() earlier if DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT=n.
>
> v2: postpone page_ext_init() to after page_alloc_init_late().
>
> init/main.c | 5 +++++
> mm/page_ext.c | 3 +--
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
> index 2b7b7fe173c9..5d9904370f76 100644
> --- a/init/main.c
> +++ b/init/main.c
> @@ -696,7 +696,9 @@ asmlinkage __visible void __init start_kernel(void)
> initrd_start = 0;
> }
> #endif
> +#ifndef CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT
> page_ext_init();
> +#endif
> kmemleak_init();
> setup_per_cpu_pageset();
> numa_policy_init();
> @@ -1147,6 +1149,9 @@ static noinline void __init kernel_init_freeable(void)
> sched_init_smp();
>
> page_alloc_init_late();
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT
> + page_ext_init();
> +#endif
>
> do_basic_setup();
Is this really necessary? Why cannot we simply postpone page_ext_init
unconditioanally?
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_ext.c b/mm/page_ext.c
> index ae44f7adbe07..d76fd51e312a 100644
> --- a/mm/page_ext.c
> +++ b/mm/page_ext.c
> @@ -399,9 +399,8 @@ void __init page_ext_init(void)
> * -------------pfn-------------->
> * N0 | N1 | N2 | N0 | N1 | N2|....
> *
> - * Take into account DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT.
> */
> - if (early_pfn_to_nid(pfn) != nid)
> + if (pfn_to_nid(pfn) != nid)
> continue;
> if (init_section_page_ext(pfn, nid))
> goto oom;
Also this doesn't seem to be related, right?
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs