Re: [RFC RESEND PATCH 6/7] soc: mediatek: add MT8183 dvfsrc support

From: Henry Chen
Date: Mon Jan 07 2019 - 06:09:32 EST

Next message: Daniel Thompson: "Re: [PATCH] v2 bakclight: fix missing checks in ambient_light_zone_store"
Previous message: Dominique Martinet: "Re: [PATCH] mm/mincore: allow for making sys_mincore() privileged"
In reply to: Stephen Boyd: "Re: [RFC RESEND PATCH 6/7] soc: mediatek: add MT8183 dvfsrc support"
Next in thread: Henry Chen: "[RFC RESEND PATCH 7/7] arm64: dts: mt8183: add dvfsrc related nodes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 2019-01-04 at 07:08 +0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Henry Chen (2019-01-02 06:09:57)
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/mediatek/Kconfig
> > index a7d0667..f956f03 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/Kconfig
> > @@ -12,6 +12,21 @@ config MTK_INFRACFG
> > INFRACFG controller contains various infrastructure registers not
> > directly associated to any device.
> >
> > +config MTK_DVFSRC
> > + bool "MediaTek DVFSRC Support"
> > + depends on ARCH_MEDIATEK
> > + default ARCH_MEDIATEK
> > + select REGMAP
>
> Why?
Sorry, no need, will remove.
>
> > + select MTK_INFRACFG
> > + select PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS if PM
>
> It doesn't depend on it?
Because MTK_SCPSYS includes MTK_INFRACFG/PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS.Should I
remove these two config?
>
> > + depends on MTK_SCPSYS
> > + help
> > + Say yes here to add support for the MediaTek DVFSRC found
>
> Maybe you can spell out what the DVFSRC acronym means?
ok.
>
> > + on different MediaTek SoCs. The DVFSRC is a proprietary
> > + hardware which is used to collect all the requests from
> > + system and turn into the decision of minimum Vcore voltage
> > + and minimum DRAM frequency to fulfill those requests.
> > +
> > config MTK_PMIC_WRAP
> > tristate "MediaTek PMIC Wrapper Support"
> > depends on RESET_CONTROLLER
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/Makefile b/drivers/soc/mediatek/Makefile
> > index 9dc6670..5c010b9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/Makefile
> > @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_MTK_DVFSRC) += mtk-dvfsrc.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_MTK_INFRACFG) += mtk-infracfg.o mtk-scpsys-ext.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_MTK_PMIC_WRAP) += mtk-pmic-wrap.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_MTK_SCPSYS) += mtk-scpsys.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-dvfsrc.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-dvfsrc.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..af462a3
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-dvfsrc.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,473 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (C) 2018 MediaTek Inc.
> > + */
> > +#include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
> > +#include <linux/clk.h>
> > +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > +#include <linux/io.h>
> > +#include <linux/irq.h>
>
> Presumably both interrupt.h and irq.h aren't needed.
ok
>
> > +#include <linux/delay.h>
> > +#include <linux/kthread.h>
>
> Is this used?
No, will remove.
>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/notifier.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/pm_qos.h>
> > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
>
> Is this used?
No, will remove.
>
> > +#include <soc/mediatek/mtk_sip.h>
> > +#include <dt-bindings/power/mt8183-power.h>
> > +#include <dt-bindings/soc/mtk,dvfsrc.h>
> > +#include "mtk-scpsys.h"
> > +
> > +#define DVFSRC_IDLE 0x00
> > +#define DVFSRC_GET_TARGET_LEVEL(x) (((x) >> 0) & 0x0000ffff)
> > +#define DVFSRC_GET_CURRENT_LEVEL(x) (((x) >> 16) & 0x0000ffff)
> > +
> > +/* macro for irq */
> > +#define DVFSRC_IRQ_TIMEOUT_EN BIT(1)
> > +
> > +struct dvfsrc_opp {
> > + int vcore_opp;
> > + int dram_opp;
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct dvfsrc_domain {
> > + int id;
> > + int state;
>
> Does id or state need to be signed? Perhaps unsigned or u32 is better?
Yes. I think u32 is better.
>
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct mtk_dvfsrc;
> > +struct dvfsrc_soc_data {
> > + const int *regs;
> > + int num_opp;
> > + int num_domains;
> > + int dram_sft;
> > + int vcore_sft;
> > + const struct dvfsrc_opp **opps;
> > + struct dvfsrc_domain *domains;
> > + void (*init_soc)(struct mtk_dvfsrc *dvfsrc);
> > + int (*get_target_level)(struct mtk_dvfsrc *dvfsrc);
> > + int (*get_current_level)(struct mtk_dvfsrc *dvfsrc);
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct mtk_dvfsrc {
> > + struct device *dev;
> > + struct clk *clk_dvfsrc;
> > + const struct dvfsrc_soc_data *dvd;
> > + int dram_type;
> > + int irq;
> > + void __iomem *regs;
> > + struct mutex lock; /* generic mutex for dvfsrc driver */
>
> That's not a very useful comment. Please make it useful or remove it.
ok
>
> > +
> > + struct notifier_block qos_notifier;
> > + struct notifier_block scpsys_notifier;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static u32 dvfsrc_read(struct mtk_dvfsrc *dvfs, u32 offset)
> > +{
> > + return readl(dvfs->regs + dvfs->dvd->regs[offset]);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void dvfsrc_write(struct mtk_dvfsrc *dvfs, u32 offset, u32 val)
> > +{
> > + writel(val, dvfs->regs + dvfs->dvd->regs[offset]);
> > +}
> > +
> [...]
> > +
> > +static bool dvfsrc_is_idle(struct mtk_dvfsrc *dvfsrc)
> > +{
> > + int val = 0;
> > +
> > + if (dvfsrc->dvd->get_target_level)
> > + val = dvfsrc->dvd->get_target_level(dvfsrc);
> > +
> > + return val == DVFSRC_IDLE;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int dvfsrc_wait_for_state(struct mtk_dvfsrc *dvfsrc,
> > + bool (*fp)(struct mtk_dvfsrc *))
>
> It's always dvfsrc_is_idle though, so why pass it as an argument?
Indeed, so far only for idle. I will shrink it into one function.
>
> > +{
> > + unsigned long timeout;
> > +
> > + timeout = jiffies + usecs_to_jiffies(1000);
> > +
> > + do {
> > + if (fp(dvfsrc))
> > + return 0;
> > + } while (!time_after(jiffies, timeout));
> > +
> > + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void mtk_dvfsrc_mt8183_init(struct mtk_dvfsrc *dvfsrc)
> > +{
> > + struct arm_smccc_res res;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&dvfsrc->lock);
> > +
> > + arm_smccc_smc(MTK_SIP_SPM, MTK_SIP_SPM_DVFSRC_INIT, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
> > + &res);
>
> What if that fails?
ok, will add return value check here, if fails return error and leave
init.

>
> > +
> > + dvfsrc_write(dvfsrc, DVFSRC_LEVEL_LABEL_0_1, 0x00100000);
> > +
> > + dvfsrc_write(dvfsrc, DVFSRC_LEVEL_LABEL_2_3, 0x00210011);
> > + dvfsrc_write(dvfsrc, DVFSRC_LEVEL_LABEL_4_5, 0x01100100);
> > + dvfsrc_write(dvfsrc, DVFSRC_LEVEL_LABEL_6_7, 0x01210111);
> > + dvfsrc_write(dvfsrc, DVFSRC_LEVEL_LABEL_8_9, 0x02100200);
> > + dvfsrc_write(dvfsrc, DVFSRC_LEVEL_LABEL_10_11, 0x02210211);
> > + dvfsrc_write(dvfsrc, DVFSRC_LEVEL_LABEL_12_13, 0x03210321);
> > + dvfsrc_write(dvfsrc, DVFSRC_LEVEL_LABEL_14_15, 0x03210321);
> > +
> > + /* EMI/VCORE HRT, MD2SPM, BW setting */
> > + dvfsrc_write(dvfsrc, DVFSRC_EMI_QOS0, 0x32);
> > + dvfsrc_write(dvfsrc, DVFSRC_EMI_QOS1, 0x66);
> > + dvfsrc_write(dvfsrc, DVFSRC_EMI_MD2SPM0, 0x80F8);
> > + dvfsrc_write(dvfsrc, DVFSRC_EMI_MD2SPM1, 0x0);
> > + dvfsrc_write(dvfsrc, DVFSRC_VCORE_MD2SPM0, 0x80C0);
> > +
> > + dvfsrc_write(dvfsrc, DVFSRC_RSRV_1, 0x0000001C);
> > + dvfsrc_write(dvfsrc, DVFSRC_TIMEOUT_NEXTREQ, 0x00000013);
> > + dvfsrc_write(dvfsrc, DVFSRC_INT_EN, 0x2);
> > +
> > + dvfsrc_write(dvfsrc, DVFSRC_EMI_REQUEST, 0x00290209);
> > + dvfsrc_write(dvfsrc, DVFSRC_EMI_REQUEST2, 0);
> > +
> > + dvfsrc_write(dvfsrc, DVFSRC_VCORE_REQUEST, 0x00150000);
> > +
> > + dvfsrc_write(dvfsrc, DVFSRC_QOS_EN, 0x0000407F);
> > + dvfsrc_write(dvfsrc, DVFSRC_EMI_REQUEST3, 0x09000000);
> > +
> > + dvfsrc_write(dvfsrc, DVFSRC_FORCE, 0x00400000);
> > + dvfsrc_write(dvfsrc, DVFSRC_BASIC_CONTROL, 0x0000C07B);
> > + dvfsrc_write(dvfsrc, DVFSRC_BASIC_CONTROL, 0x0000017B);
> > +
> > + dvfsrc_write(dvfsrc, DVFSRC_VCORE_REQUEST,
> > + (dvfsrc_read(dvfsrc, DVFSRC_VCORE_REQUEST)
> > + & ~(0x3 << 20)));
> > + dvfsrc_write(dvfsrc, DVFSRC_EMI_REQUEST,
> > + (dvfsrc_read(dvfsrc, DVFSRC_EMI_REQUEST)
> > + & ~(0x3 << 20)));
>
> Use some local variables so you don't read inside a write and make long
> lines.
ok.
>
> > +
> > + mutex_unlock(&dvfsrc->lock);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int mt8183_get_target_level(struct mtk_dvfsrc *dvfsrc)
> > +{
> > + return DVFSRC_GET_TARGET_LEVEL(dvfsrc_read(dvfsrc, DVFSRC_LEVEL));
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int mt8183_get_current_level(struct mtk_dvfsrc *dvfsrc)
> > +{
> > + return DVFSRC_GET_CURRENT_LEVEL(dvfsrc_read(dvfsrc, DVFSRC_LEVEL));
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int get_cur_performance_level(struct mtk_dvfsrc *dvfsrc)
> > +{
> > + int bit = 0;
> > +
> > + if (dvfsrc->dvd->get_current_level)
> > + bit = dvfsrc->dvd->get_current_level(dvfsrc);
> > +
> > + return ffs(bit);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int pm_qos_memory_bw_notify(struct notifier_block *b,
> > + unsigned long bw, void *v)
> > +{
> > + struct mtk_dvfsrc *dvfsrc;
> > +
> > + dvfsrc = container_of(b, struct mtk_dvfsrc, qos_notifier);
> > + mutex_lock(&dvfsrc->lock);
> > +
> > + dev_dbg(dvfsrc->dev, "data: 0x%lx\n", bw);
> > + dvfsrc_write(dvfsrc, DVFSRC_SW_BW_0, bw / 100);
> > +
> > + mutex_unlock(&dvfsrc->lock);
> > +
> > + return NOTIFY_OK;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int dvfsrc_set_performace(struct notifier_block *b,
> > + unsigned long l, void *v)
> > +{
> > + int i, val, highest = 0, vcore_opp = 0, dram_opp = 0;
> > + struct mtk_dvfsrc *dvfsrc;
> > + struct scp_event_data *sc = v;
> > + struct dvfsrc_domain *d;
> > +
> > + if (sc->event_type != MTK_SCPSYS_PSTATE)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + dvfsrc = container_of(b, struct mtk_dvfsrc, scpsys_notifier);
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&dvfsrc->lock);
> > + d = dvfsrc->dvd->domains;
> > +
> > + if (l > dvfsrc->dvd->num_opp || l <= 0) {
>
> How can l be < 0? It's unsigned.

I will remove it.

> > + dev_err(dvfsrc->dev, "pstate out of range = %ld\n", l);
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + for (i = 0, highest = 0; i < dvfsrc->dvd->num_domains - 1; i++, d++) {
> > + if (sc->domain_id == d->id)
> > + d->state = l;
> > + if (d->state > highest)
> > + highest = d->state;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (highest == 0) {
> > + dev_err(dvfsrc->dev, "domain not match\n");
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* translate pstate to dvfsrc level, and set it to DVFSRC HW */
> > + vcore_opp =
> > + dvfsrc->dvd->opps[dvfsrc->dram_type][highest - 1].vcore_opp;
> > + dram_opp = dvfsrc->dvd->opps[dvfsrc->dram_type][highest - 1].dram_opp;
>
> Maybe make a local variable for
>
> dvfsrc->dvd->opps[dvfsrc->dram_type][highest - 1]
>
> so you don't have to read that more than once.

ok.

>
> > +
> > + if (dvfsrc_wait_for_state(dvfsrc, dvfsrc_is_idle)) {
> > + dev_warn(dvfsrc->dev, "[%s] wait idle, last: %d -> %d\n",
> > + __func__, dvfsrc_read(dvfsrc, DVFSRC_LEVEL),
> > + dvfsrc_read(dvfsrc, DVFSRC_LAST));
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + dvfsrc_write(dvfsrc, DVFSRC_SW_REQ,
> > + dram_opp << dvfsrc->dvd->dram_sft |
> > + vcore_opp << dvfsrc->dvd->vcore_sft);
> > +
> > + if (dvfsrc_wait_for_state(dvfsrc, dvfsrc_is_idle)) {
> > + dev_warn(dvfsrc->dev, "[%s] wait idle, last: %d -> %d\n",
> > + __func__, dvfsrc_read(dvfsrc, DVFSRC_LEVEL),
> > + dvfsrc_read(dvfsrc, DVFSRC_LAST));
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + val = get_cur_performance_level(dvfsrc);
> > + if (val < highest) {
> > + dev_err(dvfsrc->dev, "current: %d < hightest: %x\n",
> > + highest, val);
> > + }
> > +out:
> > + mutex_unlock(&dvfsrc->lock);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void pstate_notifier_register(struct mtk_dvfsrc *dvfsrc)
> > +{
> > + dvfsrc->scpsys_notifier.notifier_call = dvfsrc_set_performace;
> > + register_scpsys_notifier(&dvfsrc->scpsys_notifier);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void pm_qos_notifier_register(struct mtk_dvfsrc *dvfsrc)
> > +{
> > + dvfsrc->qos_notifier.notifier_call = pm_qos_memory_bw_notify;
> > + pm_qos_add_notifier(PM_QOS_MEMORY_BANDWIDTH, &dvfsrc->qos_notifier);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static irqreturn_t mtk_dvfsrc_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
> > +{
> > + u32 val;
> > + struct mtk_dvfsrc *dvfsrc = dev_id;
> > +
> > + val = dvfsrc_read(dvfsrc, DVFSRC_INT);
> > + dvfsrc_write(dvfsrc, DVFSRC_INT_CLR, val);
> > + dvfsrc_write(dvfsrc, DVFSRC_INT_CLR, 0x0);
> > + if (val & DVFSRC_IRQ_TIMEOUT_EN)
> > + dev_warn(dvfsrc->dev, "timeout at spm = %x", val);
> > +
>
> Do you need to handle the irq at all? It looks like you are cleaning up
> something and then complaining if there's a timeout, but otherwise
> nothing goes on so perhaps the irq can just be ignored and nobody will
> be the wiser?

ok, it only for alarm system a timeout message.

>
> > + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int mtk_dvfsrc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct resource *res;
> > + struct mtk_dvfsrc *dvfsrc;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + dvfsrc = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*dvfsrc), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!dvfsrc)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + dvfsrc->dvd = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> > + dvfsrc->dev = &pdev->dev;
> > +
> > + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> > + dvfsrc->regs = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
> > + if (IS_ERR(dvfsrc->regs))
> > + return PTR_ERR(dvfsrc->regs);
> > +
> > + dvfsrc->clk_dvfsrc = devm_clk_get(dvfsrc->dev, "dvfsrc");
> > + if (IS_ERR(dvfsrc->clk_dvfsrc)) {
> > + dev_err(dvfsrc->dev, "failed to get clock: %ld\n",
> > + PTR_ERR(dvfsrc->clk_dvfsrc));
> > + return PTR_ERR(dvfsrc->clk_dvfsrc);
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = clk_prepare_enable(dvfsrc->clk_dvfsrc);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + ret = of_property_read_u32(dvfsrc->dev->of_node, "dram_type",
> > + &dvfsrc->dram_type);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(dvfsrc->dev, "failed to get dram_type: %d\n", ret);
> > + clk_disable_unprepare(dvfsrc->clk_dvfsrc);
>
> Why do you need to enable the clk before reading a DT property? Do that
> first and then enable the clk so you don't have to unwind it here?
ok.
>
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + dvfsrc->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> > + ret = request_irq(dvfsrc->irq, mtk_dvfsrc_interrupt
> > + , IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH, "dvfsrc", dvfsrc);
>
> Nitpick: This is oddly placed comma.
ok.
>
> > + if (ret)
> > + dev_dbg(dvfsrc->dev, "interrupt not use\n");
> > +
> > + mutex_init(&dvfsrc->lock);
> > + if (dvfsrc->dvd->init_soc)
> > + dvfsrc->dvd->init_soc(dvfsrc);
> > +
> > + pstate_notifier_register(dvfsrc);
> > + pm_qos_notifier_register(dvfsrc);
> > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dvfsrc);
>
> Probably should assign the platform data before anything can use it,
> including notifiers?
ok. will move it.
>
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct dvfsrc_opp dvfsrc_opp_mt8183_lp4[] = {
> > + {0, 0}, {1, 0}, {1, 1}, {1, 2},
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct dvfsrc_opp dvfsrc_opp_mt8183_1p3[] = {
> > + {0, 0}, {0, 1}, {1, 1}, {1, 2},
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct dvfsrc_opp *dvfsrc_opp_mt8183[] = {
> > + [MT8183_DVFSRC_OPP_LP4] = dvfsrc_opp_mt8183_lp4,
> > + [MT8183_DVFSRC_OPP_LP4X] = dvfsrc_opp_mt8183_1p3,
> > + [MT8183_DVFSRC_OPP_LP3] = dvfsrc_opp_mt8183_1p3,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct dvfsrc_domain dvfsrc_domains_mt8183[] = {
> > + {MT8183_POWER_DOMAIN_MFG_ASYNC, 0},
>
> Nitpick: Put a space around { and }
ok.
>
> > + {MT8183_POWER_DOMAIN_MFG, 0},
> > + {MT8183_POWER_DOMAIN_CAM, 0},
> > + {MT8183_POWER_DOMAIN_DISP, 0},
> > + {MT8183_POWER_DOMAIN_ISP, 0},
> > + {MT8183_POWER_DOMAIN_VDEC, 0},
> > + {MT8183_POWER_DOMAIN_VENC, 0},
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct dvfsrc_soc_data mt8183_data = {
> > + .opps = dvfsrc_opp_mt8183,
> > + .num_opp = ARRAY_SIZE(dvfsrc_opp_mt8183_lp4),
> > + .regs = mt8183_regs,
> > + .domains = dvfsrc_domains_mt8183,
> > + .num_domains = ARRAY_SIZE(dvfsrc_domains_mt8183),
> > + .init_soc = mtk_dvfsrc_mt8183_init,
> > + .get_target_level = mt8183_get_target_level,
> > + .get_current_level = mt8183_get_current_level,
> > + .dram_sft = 0,
> > + .vcore_sft = 2,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int mtk_dvfsrc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + return 0;
> > +}
>
> You can just leave it out if it does nothing.
I will add clk_disable_unprepare here as Nicolas suggestion.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-mediatek mailing list
> Linux-mediatek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
>

Next message: Daniel Thompson: "Re: [PATCH] v2 bakclight: fix missing checks in ambient_light_zone_store"
Previous message: Dominique Martinet: "Re: [PATCH] mm/mincore: allow for making sys_mincore() privileged"
In reply to: Stephen Boyd: "Re: [RFC RESEND PATCH 6/7] soc: mediatek: add MT8183 dvfsrc support"
Next in thread: Henry Chen: "[RFC RESEND PATCH 7/7] arm64: dts: mt8183: add dvfsrc related nodes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]