Re: Re: [PATCH v5 02/11] ata: pata_acpi: Make PCI dependency explicit

[Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz]

On 01/07/2019 12:12 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 7:11 PM Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> After 'commit 5d32a66541c4 ("PCI/ACPI: Allow ACPI to be built without
>> CONFIG_PCI set")' dependencies on CONFIG_PCI that previously were
>> satisfied implicitly through dependencies on CONFIG_ACPI have to be
>> specified directly. PATA_ACPI is a PCI device driver but the PCI
>> dependency has not been explicitly called out.
>>
>> Fixes: 5d32a66541c46 ("PCI/ACPI: Allow ACPI to be built without CONFIG_PCI set")
>> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/ata/Kconfig | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/ata/Kconfig b/drivers/ata/Kconfig
>> index 4ca7a6b4eaae..8218db17ebdb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/ata/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/ata/Kconfig
>> @@ -1091,7 +1091,7 @@ comment "Generic fallback / legacy drivers"
>>
>>  config PATA_ACPI
>>         tristate "ACPI firmware driver for PATA"
>> -       depends on ATA_ACPI && ATA_BMDMA
>> +       depends on ATA_ACPI && ATA_BMDMA && PCI
>>         help
>>           This option enables an ACPI method driver which drives
>>           motherboard PATA controller interfaces through the ACPI
>> --
> 
> Any objections against this one from anyone?

Patch looks correct to me (pata_acpi is indeed a PCI driver):

Acked-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx>

but it is best to wait for Jens' ACK if you want to merge it
through ACPI tree..

Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics