Debian is very secure
But it uses systemD as its' init system which has a really bad
security: over 1 million lines of poorly written code and authors are
deliberately ignoring the security issues - to a point where systemD
has been awarded a Pwnie anti-award because of arrogant devs refusing
to fix a critical vulnerability. If you need a true security, choose
Devuan: it has all the benefits of Debian + much simpler init system
with in order of magnitude better security, thanks to "Keep It Simple,
Because Debian doesn't come from a company,
it can't go out of business or be taken over.
As a technical project, Debian can ruin itself by choosing the
political decisions over technical, like it recently did by removing a
Weboob package after the herassment of some SSJiWs from Debian
antiher.assment team. Luckily Devuan is not affected by this madness.
ÑÑ, 3 ÑÐÐ. 2019 Ð. Ð 07:40, Gary Dale <garyndp@xxxxxxxxx>:
On 2019-01-02 5:51 a.m., Alessandro Baggi wrote:
> Hi list,
> I'm new to this list and I'm choosing the right distribution for
> server needs. I hope that I'm not OT and don't want start a flame. I'm
> evaluating the possibility to switch on debian so I hope you will give
> your experiences about this topic.
> At the moment I'm using CentOS 7 on server and workstation but very
> old software, add third repos for get some software, use unmaintained
> software where patchs are released by dev distro team, big changes
> between a current release and next release, big corporation piloted
> distro, waiting that rh release a security patches and then recompiled
> on centos, problem on new hardware, unable to install new software
> from source due to old libs get me bored, and frustated in the last
> year. I like flexibility and I noticed that centos chains my knowledge.
> Today seems that RH Family is the standard and rh is more supported by
> software vendors. Considering 10 years of support, Selinux working out
> of the box, stability, enteprise class and free distro..user choose
> Centos with the perception that things work better because all is
> "followed" by a corporation. With this assumption users feel more
> secure and unfailing.
> This is not necessarely true. I think that is the sysadmin that make
> things safer, secure and unfailing. Sure that a stable and reliable OS
> take his part but when big blue take this game I'm not so sure about
> centos future. What if someone will choose to drop centos project?
> Maybe this is premature but from this "Why not choose a stable and
> community piloted distro where user needs are first purpose?"
> I used Debian in the past on several server for a big company without
> any problems but now are several years that I use centos on server and
> workstation and today I lost my debian knowledge about stability on
> server usage.
> Why you choose debian on server? Where for you it is better than
> centos and other server distro?
> Thanks in advance.
Because Debian doesn't come from a company, it can't go out of business
or be taken over. And because Debian has lots of spinoffs, including
distros that are in the commercial server market (e.g. Ubuntu), you can
bet that everything runs on it and it runs on everything.
Debian is also very stable and very secure. While Red Hat may have a
segment of the corporate market, I'll bet that there are more Debian
servers than Red Hat. If you think Red Hat has the market cornered, you
aren't looking at the full market.
Then there are things like the Raspberry Pi, which are used in a lot of
specialized server-type tasks, that mainly use Debian. They can do a lot
of things that are useful in a corporate environment that you wouldn't
want to put on a real server.
I also use Debian on my desktop (I have for decades) so there is a good
knowledge crossover. I don't need to learn and use two different kinds