Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: imx: Add Y Soft IOTA Draco, Hydra and Ursa boards

[Rob Herring]

On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 10:09 AM VokÃÄ Michal <Michal.Vokac@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 8.1.2019 16:00, VokÃÄ Michal wrote:
> > On 8.1.2019 15:56, Rob Herring wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 5:43 AM VokÃÄ Michal <Michal.Vokac@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 29.12.2018 00:25, Rob Herring wrote:
> >>>> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 02:42:11PM +0000, VokÃÄ Michal wrote:
> >>>>> These are i.MX6S/DL based SBCs embedded in various Y Soft products.
> >>>>> All share the same board design but have slightly different HW
> >>>>> configuration.
> >>
> >> [...]
> >>
> >>>>> +/ {
> >>>>> +    model = "Y Soft IOTA Draco i.MX6Solo board";
> >>>>> +    compatible = "ysoft,imx6dl-yapp4-draco", "fsl,imx6dl";
> >>>>
> >>>> All compatible strings should be documented, not just SoC vendor boards.
> >>>
> >>> OK, I will add a Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ysoft.yaml file for that.
> >>
> >> Actually, it should go in fsl.yaml. The file for every board vendor is
> >> gone. i.MX was pretty much the only platform doing that.
> >
> > OK, I will do so. Thank you.
>
> I am sorry for the noise Rob, but your "dt-bindings: arm: Convert FSL
> board/soc bindings to json-schema" patch is not in mainline yet. So
> there is no arm/fsl.yaml file to add my compatible strings into.
>
> Now I do not know how to respin. Should I send this updated dts/dtsi
> patch as usual and create another patch with the ysoft compatible
> strings against your yaml-bindings-v2 branch, where the fsl.yaml file
> exist? Or something else?

Humm, I thought Shawn had applied to his tree as there were some conflicts.

Shawn, do you need me to resend?

Rob