Re: [PATCH v5 perf, bpf-next 1/7] perf, bpf: Introduce PERF_RECORD_KSYMBOL

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 10:28:58AM -0800, Song Liu wrote:

> @@ -648,11 +649,18 @@ struct perf_event_mmap_page {
>   *   PERF_RECORD_MISC_COMM_EXEC  - PERF_RECORD_COMM event
>   *   PERF_RECORD_MISC_FORK_EXEC  - PERF_RECORD_FORK event (perf internal)
>   *   PERF_RECORD_MISC_SWITCH_OUT - PERF_RECORD_SWITCH* events
> + *   PERF_RECORD_MISC_KSYMBOL_*  - PERF_RECORD_KSYMBOL event
>   */
>  #define PERF_RECORD_MISC_MMAP_DATA		(1 << 13)
>  #define PERF_RECORD_MISC_COMM_EXEC		(1 << 13)
>  #define PERF_RECORD_MISC_FORK_EXEC		(1 << 13)
>  #define PERF_RECORD_MISC_SWITCH_OUT		(1 << 13)
> +
> +#define PERF_RECORD_MISC_KSYMBOL_UNREGISTER	(1 << 3)
> +#define PERF_RECORD_MISC_KSYMBOL_TYPE_MASK	(7 << 4)
> +#define PERF_RECORD_MISC_KSYMBOL_TYPE_UNKNOWN	(0 << 4)
> +#define PERF_RECORD_MISC_KSYMBOL_TYPE_BPF	(1 << 4)

So this gives us 8 possible types, of which 2 are claimed.

I suppose we already know of FTRACE_TRAMPOLINE and MODULE, which
accounts for half the space.

> +
>  /*
>   * These PERF_RECORD_MISC_* flags below are safely reused
>   * for the following events:
> @@ -965,6 +973,19 @@ enum perf_event_type {
>  	 */
>  	PERF_RECORD_NAMESPACES			= 16,
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Record ksymbol register/unregister events:
> +	 *
> +	 * struct {
> +	 *	struct perf_event_header	header;
> +	 *	u64				addr;
> +	 *	u64				len;
> +	 *	char				name[];
> +	 *	struct sample_id		sample_id;
> +	 * };
> +	 */
> +	PERF_RECORD_KSYMBOL			= 17,

Do we really need u64 length? That is, are we willing to consider
symbols larger than 4G ?

Could we not reclaim the top 32 or 16 bits thereof for that type thing
instead of using a few misc bits?