Re: [PATCH v5 perf, bpf-next 1/7] perf, bpf: Introduce PERF_RECORD_KSYMBOL

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 06:56:19PM +0000, Song Liu wrote:
> I don't think we need u64 length. 32 bit should be more than enough. 
> 
> How about we revise it as:

Yep, works. Although I would not introduce types we're not yet
generating. We can add those easily enough when needed.