Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/pkeys: copy pkey state at fork()
From: Kees Cook
Date: Tue Jan 08 2019 - 19:56:32 EST
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 1:14 PM Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 12:59 PM, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 10/26/18 12:51 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > ...
> >> The result is that, after a fork(), the child's pkey state ends up
> >> looking like it does after an execve(), which is totally wrong. pkeys
> >> that are already allocated can be allocated again, for instance.
> >
> > One thing I omitted. This was very nicely discovered and reported by
> > danielmicay@xxxxxxxxxx Thanks, Daniel!
>
> Thread ping. Is there a v2 of this, or can this go in as-is? Looks good to me:
>
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Ingo, can you take these two patches? Use of pkeys is still buggy
without it. (And probably should have a Cc: stable tag too.)
-Kees
--
Kees Cook