[PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/3] doc: Fix outdated links
From: Paul E. McKenney
Date: Wed Jan 09 2019 - 16:37:46 EST
From: Junchang Wang <junchangwang@xxxxxxxxx>
Fix outdated links in whatisRCU.txt.
Signed-off-by: Junchang Wang <junchangwang@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt b/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt
index 4a6854318b17..1ace20815bb1 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/whatisRCU.txt
@@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ rcu_dereference()
must prohibit. The rcu_dereference_protected() variant takes
a lockdep expression to indicate which locks must be acquired
by the caller. If the indicated protection is not provided,
- a lockdep splat is emitted. See RCU/Design/Requirements.html
+ a lockdep splat is emitted. See RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html
and the API's code comments for more details and example usage.
The following diagram shows how each API communicates among the
@@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ presents two such "toy" implementations of RCU, one that is implemented
in terms of familiar locking primitives, and another that more closely
resembles "classic" RCU. Both are way too simple for real-world use,
lacking both functionality and performance. However, they are useful
-in getting a feel for how RCU works. See kernel/rcupdate.c for a
+in getting a feel for how RCU works. See kernel/rcu/update.c for a
production-quality implementation, and see:
http://www.rdrop.com/users/paulmck/RCU
--
2.17.1