Re: [PATCH v12 6/7] arm64: dts: sdm845: Add interconnect provider DT nodes

[Georgi Djakov]

Hi Doug,

On 1/10/19 01:18, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 9:02 AM Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> From: David Dai <daidavid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Add RSC (Resource State Coordinator) provider
>> dictating network-on-chip interconnect bus performance
>> found on SDM845-based platforms.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Dai <daidavid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 5 +++++
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>> index b72bdb0a31a5..b3cd256a154e 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>> @@ -1324,6 +1324,11 @@
>>                                 compatible = "qcom,sdm845-rpmh-clk";
>>                                 #clock-cells = <1>;
>>                         };
>> +
>> +                       rsc_hlos: interconnect {
>> +                               compatible = "qcom,sdm845-rsc-hlos";
>> +                               #interconnect-cells = <1>;
>> +                       };
> 
> It would have been convenient if this patch had also added an include above:
> 
> #include <dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,sdm845.h>
> 
> ...while the include isn't technically needed by this patch, all the
> patches that want to actually _use_ the interconnect will need to add
> the #include and then you get to some fun fights about who has to add
> the include in which patch.  For instance these two patches won't
> compile:
> 
> * https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1545373748-1416-1-git-send-email-jshekhar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> * https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181220173026.3857-4-jcrouse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> ...because neither of them happened to add the include.  Maybe they
> were both assuming someone else would do it?
> 
> 
> If nobody else wants to, I'm happy to post a patch to add that include
> myself and it can be applied atop this one.  ...or if this patch needs
> to spin for some other reason maybe you could add it into this patch
> directly?

Ok, i will add it and resend.

Thanks,
Georgi