Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] tee: add supp_nowait flag in tee_context struct

From: Sumit Garg
Date: Fri Jan 11 2019 - 04:57:15 EST


On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 at 15:24, Daniel Thompson
<daniel.thompson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 01:00:49PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 at 19:53, Daniel Thompson
> > <daniel.thompson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/tee/tee_core.c b/drivers/tee/tee_core.c
> > > > index 9ddb89e..5d6c317 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/tee/tee_core.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/tee/tee_core.c
> > > > @@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ static int tee_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> > > > if (IS_ERR(ctx))
> > > > return PTR_ERR(ctx);
> > > >
> > > > + ctx->supp_nowait = false;
> > > > filp->private_data = ctx;
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > > > @@ -981,6 +982,7 @@ tee_client_open_context(struct tee_context *start,
> > > > } while (IS_ERR(ctx) && PTR_ERR(ctx) != -ENOMEM);
> > > >
> > > > put_device(put_dev);
> > > > + ctx->supp_nowait = true;
> > >
> > > Why automatically set supp_nowait inside open_context() ?
> > >
> >
> > I think this is the default behaviour (non-blocking request) that any
> > in kernel client would expect. Also this flag could be configured
> > again before call to open_session() if any in kernel client requires
> > different behaviour.
>
> Makes sense. I think this is a deep enough behaviour to warrant proper
> commenting though.
>

Sure, will add comments.

-Sumit

>
> Daniel.