Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cisco tree with the vfs tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Daniel,

On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 16:29:23 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the cisco tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   dcf8001d292b ("vfs: Suppress MS_* flag defs within the kernel unless explicitly enabled")
> 
> from the vfs tree and commit:
> 
>   2c070709ea75 ("This updates the x86 code to use the CONFIG_GENERIC_CMDLINE")
> 
> from the cisco tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> index e493202bf265,ee109f490b22..000000000000
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
> @@@ -51,7 -51,7 +51,8 @@@
>   #include <linux/kvm_para.h>
>   #include <linux/dma-contiguous.h>
>   #include <xen/xen.h>
>  +#include <uapi/linux/mount.h>
> + #include <linux/cmdline.h>
>   
>   #include <linux/errno.h>
>   #include <linux/kernel.h>

This is now a conflict between the cicso tree and Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Attachment: pgpXYCmbWLqtq.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature