Re: [PATCHv2 2/7] acpi: change the topo of acpi_table_upgrade()

[Dave Hansen]

On 1/10/19 9:12 PM, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> The current acpi_table_upgrade() relies on initrd_start, but this var is

"var" meaning variable?

Could you please go back and try to ensure you spell out all the words
you are intending to write?  I think "topo" probably means "topology",
but it's a really odd word to use for changing the arguments of a
function, so I'm not sure.

There are a couple more of these in this set.

> only valid after relocate_initrd(). There is requirement to extract the
> acpi info from initrd before memblock-allocator can work(see [2/4]), hence
> acpi_table_upgrade() need to accept the input param directly.

"[2/4]"

It looks like you quickly resent this set without updating the patch
descriptions.

> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/tables.c b/drivers/acpi/tables.c
> index 61203ee..84e0a79 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/tables.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/tables.c
> @@ -471,10 +471,8 @@ static DECLARE_BITMAP(acpi_initrd_installed, NR_ACPI_INITRD_TABLES);
>  
>  #define MAP_CHUNK_SIZE   (NR_FIX_BTMAPS << PAGE_SHIFT)
>  
> -void __init acpi_table_upgrade(void)
> +void __init acpi_table_upgrade(void *data, size_t size)
>  {
> -	void *data = (void *)initrd_start;
> -	size_t size = initrd_end - initrd_start;
>  	int sig, no, table_nr = 0, total_offset = 0;
>  	long offset = 0;
>  	struct acpi_table_header *table;

I know you are just replacing some existing variables, but we have a
slightly higher standard for naming when you actually have to specify
arguments to a function.  Can you please give these proper names?