Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] iio: chemical: bme680: Add device-tree support
From: Himanshu Jha
Date: Tue Jan 15 2019 - 13:41:29 EST
Hi Sebastien,
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 03:00:41PM -0500, sebastien bourdelin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 1/12/19 4:42 AM, Himanshu Jha wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 03:53:58PM -0500, Sebastien Bourdelin wrote:
> > > This commit allow the driver to work with device-tree.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sebastien Bourdelin <sebastien.bourdelin@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > I get the following compilation failure:
> >
> > Below I have `allyesconfig` except 'BME680' configure as [M]
> > in case you wish to reproduce.
> >
> > himanshu@himanshu-Vostro-3559:~/linux-next$ grep -i -w 'CONFIG_BME680\|CONFIG_ACPI\|CONFIG_OF' .config
> > CONFIG_ACPI=y
> > CONFIG_OF=y
> > CONFIG_BME680=m
> > himanshu@himanshu-Vostro-3559:~/linux-next$ sudo make drivers/iio/chemical/bme680_spi.o
> > make[1]: Nothing to be done for 'all'.
> > CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
> > DESCEND objtool
> > CC [M] drivers/iio/chemical/bme680_spi.o
> > In file included from ./include/linux/acpi.h:41:0,
> > from drivers/iio/chemical/bme680_spi.c:7:
> > ./include/linux/module.h:213:1: error: expected â,â or â;â before âexternâ
> > extern typeof(name) __mod_##type##__##name##_device_table \
> > ^
> > drivers/iio/chemical/bme680_spi.c:119:1: note: in expansion of macro âMODULE_DEVICE_TABLEâ
> > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, bme680_of_spi_match);
> > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > scripts/Makefile.build:291: recipe for target 'drivers/iio/chemical/bme680_spi.o' failed
> > make[1]: *** [drivers/iio/chemical/bme680_spi.o] Error 1
> > Makefile:1741: recipe for target 'drivers/iio/chemical/bme680_spi.o' failed
> > make: *** [drivers/iio/chemical/bme680_spi.o] Error 2
> Thanks for the test, this is bad, i will fix that!
> > BUT if:
> >
> > himanshu@himanshu-Vostro-3559:~/linux-next$ make allyesconfig
> > scripts/kconfig/conf --allyesconfig Kconfig
> > #
> > # configuration written to .config
> > #
> >
> > himanshu@himanshu-Vostro-3559:~/linux-next$ sudo make drivers/iio/chemical/bme680_spi.o
> > scripts/kconfig/conf --syncconfig Kconfig
> > make[1]: Nothing to be done for 'all'.
> > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/dtc.o
> > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/flattree.o
> > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/fstree.o
> > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/data.o
> > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/livetree.o
> > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/treesource.o
> > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/srcpos.o
> > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/checks.o
> > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/util.o
> > LEX scripts/dtc/dtc-lexer.lex.c
> > YACC scripts/dtc/dtc-parser.tab.h
> > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/dtc-lexer.lex.o
> > YACC scripts/dtc/dtc-parser.tab.c
> > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/dtc-parser.tab.o
> > HOSTLD scripts/dtc/dtc
> > CC scripts/mod/empty.o
> > MKELF scripts/mod/elfconfig.h
> > HOSTCC scripts/mod/modpost.o
> > CC scripts/mod/devicetable-offsets.s
> > HOSTCC scripts/mod/file2alias.o
> > HOSTCC scripts/mod/sumversion.o
> > HOSTLD scripts/mod/modpost
> > CC kernel/bounds.s
> > CC arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.s
> > CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
> > DESCEND objtool
> > CC drivers/iio/chemical/bme680_spi.o
> >
> > Compiles without any issues.
> Hum, weird it compiles actually :s
I think this behavior is observed due to:
include/linux/module.h +212
#ifdef MODULE
/* Creates an alias so file2alias.c can find device table. */
#define MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(type, name) \
extern typeof(name) __mod_##type##__##name##_device_table \
__attribute__ ((unused, alias(__stringify(name))))
#else /* !MODULE */
#define MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(type, name)
#endif
So, when we build the driver as a module[M] then macro expansion
takes place giving us the compiler warning.
OTOH, if the driver is built as builtin[*] then marco expands
to nothing or simply goes away. And `;' completes the struct
declaration while silencing the warning.
static const struct of_device_id bme680_of_spi_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "bosch,bme680", },
{},
}
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, bme680_of_spi_match);
converts to:
static const struct of_device_id bme680_of_spi_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "bosch,bme680", },
{},
}
;
^^^
Amazing!
Correct me if I'm wrong somewhere, took me 2 hours to figure
that out :D
Also, I some additional interesting observations:
When buitin[*] -> no symbol tables in the RO segment of object file
himanshu@himanshu-Vostro-3559:~/linux-next$ nm drivers/iio/chemical/bme680_spi.o
0000000000000000 d __addressable_bme680_spi_driver_init130
00000000000001a0 r bme680_acpi_match
U bme680_core_probe
0000000000000000 r bme680_of_spi_match
00000000000000a0 d bme680_regmap_bus
U bme680_regmap_config
0000000000000000 t bme680_regmap_spi_read
0000000000000010 t bme680_regmap_spi_write
0000000000000000 d bme680_spi_driver
0000000000000000 t bme680_spi_driver_exit
0000000000000000 t bme680_spi_driver_init
00000000000001e0 r bme680_spi_id
0000000000000070 t bme680_spi_probe
U _dev_err
U __devm_regmap_init
U driver_unregister
0000000000000000 d __exitcall_bme680_spi_driver_exit
0000000000000000 t __initcall_bme680_spi_driver_init6
U regmap_read
U regmap_update_bits_base
U regmap_write
U spi_get_device_id
U __spi_register_driver
U spi_setup
U spi_write_then_read
U __stack_chk_fail
While when [M] -> we can see the symbol tables in the RO segment
himanshu@himanshu-Vostro-3559:~/linux-next$ nm drivers/iio/chemical/bme680_spi.o
00000000000001a0 r bme680_acpi_match
U bme680_core_probe
0000000000000000 r bme680_of_spi_match
00000000000000a0 d bme680_regmap_bus
U bme680_regmap_config
0000000000000000 t bme680_regmap_spi_read
0000000000000010 t bme680_regmap_spi_write
0000000000000000 d bme680_spi_driver
0000000000000000 t bme680_spi_driver_exit
0000000000000000 t bme680_spi_driver_init
00000000000001e0 r bme680_spi_id
0000000000000070 t bme680_spi_probe
0000000000000000 T cleanup_module
U _dev_err
U __devm_regmap_init
U driver_unregister
0000000000000000 T init_module
00000000000001a0 R __mod_acpi__bme680_acpi_match_device_table <---
0000000000000000 R __mod_of__bme680_of_spi_match_device_table <---
00000000000001e0 R __mod_spi__bme680_spi_id_device_table <---
U regmap_read
U regmap_update_bits_base
U regmap_write
U spi_get_device_id
U __spi_register_driver
U spi_setup
U spi_write_then_read
U __stack_chk_fail
U __this_module
0000000000000033 r __UNIQUE_ID_author38
000000000000000f r __UNIQUE_ID_description39
0000000000000000 r __UNIQUE_ID_license40
Thanks!
--
Himanshu Jha
Undergraduate Student
Department of Electronics & Communication
Guru Tegh Bahadur Institute of Technology