Re: [PATCH] fix a couple of indentation issues and remove assignment in if statements

From: Colin Ian King
Date: Wed Jan 16 2019 - 19:34:32 EST


Bah, forgot to fix up the subject line properly. V3. Coming.

On 17/01/2019 00:33, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> There is an if statement and a return statement that are incorrectly
> indented. Fix these. Also replace the assignment-in-if statements
> to assignment followed by an if to keep to the coding style.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> V2: also clean up the assignment-in-if statements too
>
> ---
>
> drivers/net/sb1000.c | 11 +++++++----
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/sb1000.c b/drivers/net/sb1000.c
> index 7820fced33f6..941cfa8f1c2a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/sb1000.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/sb1000.c
> @@ -535,17 +535,20 @@ sb1000_activate(const int ioaddr[], const char* name)
> int status;
>
> ssleep(1);
> - if ((status = card_send_command(ioaddr, name, Command0, st)))
> + status = card_send_command(ioaddr, name, Command0, st);
> + if (status)
> return status;
> - if ((status = card_send_command(ioaddr, name, Command1, st)))
> + status = card_send_command(ioaddr, name, Command1, st);
> + if (status)
> return status;
> if (st[3] != 0xf1) {
> - if ((status = sb1000_start_get_set_command(ioaddr, name)))
> + status = sb1000_start_get_set_command(ioaddr, name);
> + if (status)
> return status;
> return -EIO;
> }
> udelay(1000);
> - return sb1000_start_get_set_command(ioaddr, name);
> + return sb1000_start_get_set_command(ioaddr, name);
> }
>
> /* get SB1000 firmware version */
>