Re: kmemleak panic

From: Robin Murphy
Date: Fri Jan 18 2019 - 14:12:34 EST


On 2019-01-18 3:36 pm, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffffffc021e00000

I can't help but notice that you seem to get the same address in 4 different logs - if it really is that deterministic then that's quite the boon for debugging (FWIW my first thought is that it looks a lot like a phys_to_virt() of something bogus). I've never used kmemleak myself, but looking at where it's crashing it appears to think that that address is a valid object - if I'm reading the docs correctly then I guess the "dump" command ought to be able to tell you where it thinks that object came from.

Robin.