Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] usb: split code locating ACPI companion into port and device

[Dmitry Torokhov]

On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 2:29 PM Rajat Jain <rajatja@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Marcel,
>
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 11:51 AM Marcel Holtmann <marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Rajat,
> >
> > > In preparation for handling embedded USB devices let's split
> > > usb_acpi_find_companion() into usb_acpi_find_companion_for_device() and
> > > usb_acpi_find_companion_for_port().
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Rajat Jain <rajatja@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Tested-by: Sukumar Ghorai <sukumar.ghorai@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > v4: Add Acked-by and Tested-by in signatures.
> > > v3: same as v1
> > > v2: same as v1
> > >
> > > drivers/usb/core/usb-acpi.c | 133 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> > > 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
> >
> > what is the plan here? I take this via bluetooth-next tree?
>
> Yes, I'd think that would be the best plan. Dmitry / Greg - do you
> have any objections / suggestions?

That's up to Greg, but since he'd acked the patches I'd assume he's OK
with taking it through bluetooth. As an option Marcel could cut an
immutable branch off 4.20 with the first 2 patches so that he and Greg
can both pull it into their main branches and then git will do the
right thing when Linus pulls from them. Lee uses quite a bit of them
in MFD and other maintainers are known to occasionally make them for
work that needs to be shared between trees.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry