Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: Rename ambiguously named memory.stat counters and functions

[Chris Down]

Roman Gushchin writes:
> I'd personally go with memcg_vmstat_percpu. Not insisting,
> but you end up using both vmstat and vmstats, which isn't very
> consistent.

Yeah, we also have similar naming in accumulated_vmstats. Hmm, let me think 
about this a bit and get back to you tomorrow. The main bit I was concerned 
about was memory_events vs. events -- I don't really have strong opinions on 
the percpu struct's exact naming/plurality.

> Other than that looks good to me. Please, feel free to add
> Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@xxxxxx>

Thanks!