Re: [PATCH 1/1] int_sqrt() adjustments

From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Sun Jan 27 2019 - 12:34:46 EST

On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 9:06 AM Florian La Roche
<florian.laroche@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> - m = 1UL << (__fls(x) & ~1UL);
> + m = 1UL << ((int)__fls(x) & ~1);

No need to add the cast. It doesn't do anything and just makes the code uglier.

The type of a shift operator is the type of the left side of the shift
(with the usual int-promotion).

The type of the right side simply doesn't matter (the *value* does, of
course, but because the value range is limited, the cast is just