Re: [PATCH V2 05/12] perf mem: Clean up output format and sort order string
From: Liang, Kan
Date: Mon Jan 28 2019 - 13:41:12 EST
On 1/28/2019 10:09 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 07:15:23AM -0800, kan.liang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Now, "--phys-data" is the only option which impacts the output format
and sort order. A simple "if else" is enough to handle the option.
But there will be more options added, e.g. "--data-page-size", which
also impact the output format and sort order. The code will become too
complex to be maintained.
Divide the big printf into several small pieces. Output the specific
piece only if the related option is applied.
Divide the big sort order string into several small pieces as well.
Appends specific sort string only if the related option is applied.
No functional change.
hum, I'm getting some functional changes:
# perf mem record
# perf.old mem report --stdio > base
# perf mem report --stdio > new
# diff -puw base new
--- base 2019-01-28 16:06:13.264991170 +0100
+++ new 2019-01-28 16:06:31.347680820 +0100
@@ -5,8133 +5,7346 @@
#
# Samples: 3K of event 'cpu/mem-loads,ldlat=30/P'
# Total weight : 203677
-# Sort order : local_weight,mem,sym,dso,symbol_daddr,dso_daddr,snoop,tlb,locked
+# Sort order : mem,sym,dso,symbol_daddr,dso_daddr,tlb,locked,ipc_null
#
-# Overhead Samples Local Weight Memory access Symbol Shared Object Data Symbol Data Object Snoop TLB access Locked
-# ........ ............ ............ ........................ ......................................... ................ ................................................. ............................. ............ ...................... ......
+# Overhead Samples Memory access Symbol Shared Object Data Symbol Data Object TLB access Locked IPC [IPC Coverage]
+# ........ ............ ........................ ......................................... ................ ................................................. ............................. ...................... ...... ....................
could you please split this patch to separate simple changes?
Thanks for the test. I will fix it and split the patch in V3.
Thanks,
Kan
jirka
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
No changes since V1
tools/perf/builtin-mem.c | 132 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
tools/perf/util/sort.h | 2 +
2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-mem.c b/tools/perf/builtin-mem.c
index 57393e9..6048fca 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-mem.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-mem.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
#include "util/mem-events.h"
#include "util/debug.h"
#include "util/symbol.h"
+#include "util/sort.h"
#define MEM_OPERATION_LOAD 0x1
#define MEM_OPERATION_STORE 0x2
@@ -153,7 +154,7 @@ dump_raw_samples(struct perf_tool *tool,
{
struct perf_mem *mem = container_of(tool, struct perf_mem, tool);
struct addr_location al;
- const char *fmt;
+ const char *fmt, *field_sep;
if (machine__resolve(machine, &al, sample) < 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "problem processing %d event, skipping it.\n",
@@ -167,60 +168,45 @@ dump_raw_samples(struct perf_tool *tool,
if (al.map != NULL)
al.map->dso->hit = 1;
- if (mem->phys_addr) {
- if (symbol_conf.field_sep) {
- fmt = "%d%s%d%s0x%"PRIx64"%s0x%"PRIx64"%s0x%016"PRIx64
- "%s%"PRIu64"%s0x%"PRIx64"%s%s:%s\n";
- } else {
- fmt = "%5d%s%5d%s0x%016"PRIx64"%s0x016%"PRIx64
- "%s0x%016"PRIx64"%s%5"PRIu64"%s0x%06"PRIx64
- "%s%s:%s\n";
- symbol_conf.field_sep = " ";
- }
-
- printf(fmt,
- sample->pid,
- symbol_conf.field_sep,
- sample->tid,
- symbol_conf.field_sep,
- sample->ip,
- symbol_conf.field_sep,
- sample->addr,
- symbol_conf.field_sep,
- sample->phys_addr,
- symbol_conf.field_sep,
- sample->weight,
- symbol_conf.field_sep,
- sample->data_src,
- symbol_conf.field_sep,
- al.map ? (al.map->dso ? al.map->dso->long_name : "???") : "???",
- al.sym ? al.sym->name : "???");
+ field_sep = symbol_conf.field_sep;
+ if (field_sep) {
+ fmt = "%d%s%d%s0x%"PRIx64"%s0x%"PRIx64"%s";
} else {
- if (symbol_conf.field_sep) {
- fmt = "%d%s%d%s0x%"PRIx64"%s0x%"PRIx64"%s%"PRIu64
- "%s0x%"PRIx64"%s%s:%s\n";
- } else {
- fmt = "%5d%s%5d%s0x%016"PRIx64"%s0x016%"PRIx64
- "%s%5"PRIu64"%s0x%06"PRIx64"%s%s:%s\n";
- symbol_conf.field_sep = " ";
- }
+ fmt = "%5d%s%5d%s0x%016"PRIx64"%s0x016%"PRIx64"%s";
+ symbol_conf.field_sep = " ";
+ }
+ printf(fmt,
+ sample->pid,
+ symbol_conf.field_sep,
+ sample->tid,
+ symbol_conf.field_sep,
+ sample->ip,
+ symbol_conf.field_sep,
+ sample->addr,
+ symbol_conf.field_sep);
+ if (mem->phys_addr) {
+ if (field_sep)
+ fmt = "0x%"PRIx64"%s";
+ else
+ fmt = "0x%016"PRIx64"%s";
printf(fmt,
- sample->pid,
- symbol_conf.field_sep,
- sample->tid,
- symbol_conf.field_sep,
- sample->ip,
- symbol_conf.field_sep,
- sample->addr,
- symbol_conf.field_sep,
- sample->weight,
- symbol_conf.field_sep,
- sample->data_src,
- symbol_conf.field_sep,
- al.map ? (al.map->dso ? al.map->dso->long_name : "???") : "???",
- al.sym ? al.sym->name : "???");
+ sample->phys_addr,
+ symbol_conf.field_sep);
}
+
+ if (field_sep)
+ fmt = "%"PRIu64"%s0x%"PRIx64"%s%s:%s\n";
+ else
+ fmt = "%5"PRIu64"%s0x%06"PRIx64"%s%s:%s\n";
+
+ printf(fmt,
+ sample->weight,
+ symbol_conf.field_sep,
+ sample->data_src,
+ symbol_conf.field_sep,
+ al.map ? (al.map->dso ? al.map->dso->long_name : "???") : "???",
+ al.sym ? al.sym->name : "???");
out_put:
addr_location__put(&al);
return 0;
@@ -262,10 +248,12 @@ static int report_raw_events(struct perf_mem *mem)
if (ret < 0)
goto out_delete;
+ printf("# PID, TID, IP, ADDR, ");
+
if (mem->phys_addr)
- printf("# PID, TID, IP, ADDR, PHYS ADDR, LOCAL WEIGHT, DSRC, SYMBOL\n");
- else
- printf("# PID, TID, IP, ADDR, LOCAL WEIGHT, DSRC, SYMBOL\n");
+ printf("PHYS ADDR, ");
+
+ printf("LOCAL WEIGHT, DSRC, SYMBOL\n");
ret = perf_session__process_events(session);
@@ -273,11 +261,30 @@ static int report_raw_events(struct perf_mem *mem)
perf_session__delete(session);
return ret;
}
+static char *get_sort_order(struct perf_mem *mem)
+{
+ char sort[MAX_SORT_ORDER_STR];
+
+ /*
+ * there is no weight (cost) associated with stores, so don't print
+ * the column
+ */
+ if (mem->operation & MEM_OPERATION_STORE)
+ strcpy(sort, "--sort=mem,sym,dso,symbol_daddr,dso_daddr,tlb,locked");
+ else
+ strcpy(sort, default_mem_sort_order);
+
+ if (mem->phys_addr)
+ strcat(sort, ",phys_daddr");
+
+ return strdup(sort);
+}
static int report_events(int argc, const char **argv, struct perf_mem *mem)
{
const char **rep_argv;
int ret, i = 0, j, rep_argc;
+ char *new_sort_order;
if (mem->dump_raw)
return report_raw_events(mem);
@@ -291,20 +298,9 @@ static int report_events(int argc, const char **argv, struct perf_mem *mem)
rep_argv[i++] = "--mem-mode";
rep_argv[i++] = "-n"; /* display number of samples */
- /*
- * there is no weight (cost) associated with stores, so don't print
- * the column
- */
- if (!(mem->operation & MEM_OPERATION_LOAD)) {
- if (mem->phys_addr)
- rep_argv[i++] = "--sort=mem,sym,dso,symbol_daddr,"
- "dso_daddr,tlb,locked,phys_daddr";
- else
- rep_argv[i++] = "--sort=mem,sym,dso,symbol_daddr,"
- "dso_daddr,tlb,locked";
- } else if (mem->phys_addr)
- rep_argv[i++] = "--sort=local_weight,mem,sym,dso,symbol_daddr,"
- "dso_daddr,snoop,tlb,locked,phys_daddr";
+ new_sort_order = get_sort_order(mem);
+ if (new_sort_order)
+ rep_argv[i++] = new_sort_order;
for (j = 1; j < argc; j++, i++)
rep_argv[i] = argv[j];
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/sort.h b/tools/perf/util/sort.h
index ea8ff64..fc8290c 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/sort.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/sort.h
@@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ extern struct sort_entry sort_srcline;
extern enum sort_type sort__first_dimension;
extern const char default_mem_sort_order[];
+#define MAX_SORT_ORDER_STR 128
+
struct he_stat {
u64 period;
u64 period_sys;
--
2.7.4