Re: Author of GPC-Slots2 promises to sue "John Doe" who violated GPL recission. (update)

From: linuxgpletc
Date: Tue Jan 29 2019 - 04:10:49 EST


Some updates (2):

http://8ch.net/tech/res/1018729.html#1024398


Anonymous 01/29/19 (Tue) 08:47:02 No.1024601
1024597
HOW MUCH DID YOU FUCKING PAY ME?
Nothing. Thank God for that.
ARE WE IN A CONTRACT?
No.
IT IS A BARE LICENSE.
Is this lawyer speak? I'm not a lawyer, sorry.
I CAN RESCIND IT AT ANY TIME.
wrong
THE CODE IS NOT YOUR PROPERTY. IT IS _MY_ PROPERTY.
It is your intellectual property that you have licensed to me under the GPLv2+.
I ALLOWED YOU A LICENSE TO USE IT.
correct
I HAVE NOW REVOKED THAT LICENSE FROM YOU YOU [...].
no
Show me a case otherwise.
why???????????
Gratis licenses, without an attached interest, are revocable.
sorry m8. you are wrong




Anonymous 01/29/19 (Tue) 09:03:54 No.1024602
1024601
>ARE WE IN A CONTRACT?
No.
Then explain to me, if we are not in a contract, how you can bind me to a "no revocation" clause. Explain it to me, slowly, please.
>IT IS A BARE LICENSE.
Is this lawyer speak? I'm not a lawyer, sorry.
Ignorance of the law is no excuse.
A bare license is simply permission.
When you allow someone to enter your house you are giving them a (bare) license to enter your house. When you tell them to leave you are rescinding that license. You can do so at any time.
Now if they pay you for "I can enter your house for 30 days", then because there is consideration, and a contract, you cannot then reneg on that term.
>I CAN RESCIND IT AT ANY TIME.
wrong
You just agreed that we are not in a contract, how can you now declare that I cannot rescind the license. Please explain you reasoning
sorry m8. you are wrong
Give you legal reasoning.