RE: [PATCH 1/2] media: dt-bindings: media: xilinx: Add Xilinx MIPI CSI-2 Rx Subsystem
From: Vishal Sagar
Date: Wed Jan 30 2019 - 00:48:44 EST
Hi Sakari,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sakari Ailus [mailto:sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2019 5:30 PM
> To: Vishal Sagar <vsagar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Vishal Sagar <vishal.sagar@xxxxxxxxxx>; Hyun Kwon <hyunk@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Michal Simek <michals@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> hans.verkuil@xxxxxxxxx; mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
> mark.rutland@xxxxxxx; Dinesh Kumar <dineshk@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-arm-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] media: dt-bindings: media: xilinx: Add Xilinx MIPI CSI-2
> Rx Subsystem
>
> Hi Vishal,
>
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 09:47:41AM +0000, Vishal Sagar wrote:
> > Hi Sakari,
> >
> > Thanks for reviewing this.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Sakari Ailus [mailto:sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2019 6:35 PM
> > > To: Vishal Sagar <vishal.sagar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Hyun Kwon <hyunk@xxxxxxxxxx>; laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > Michal Simek <michals@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; hans.verkuil@xxxxxxxxx; mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx;
> > > robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; mark.rutland@xxxxxxx; Dinesh Kumar
> > > <dineshk@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> > > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] media: dt-bindings: media: xilinx: Add Xilinx MIPI
> CSI-2
> > > Rx Subsystem
> > >
> > > EXTERNAL EMAIL
> > >
> > > Hi Vishal,
> > >
> > > The patchset hard escaped me somehow earlier and your reply to Rob made
> me
> > > notice it again. Thanks. :-)
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 12:24:43AM +0530, Vishal Sagar wrote:
> > > > Add bindings documentation for Xilinx MIPI CSI-2 Rx Subsystem.
> > > >
> > > > The Xilinx MIPI CSI-2 Rx Subsystem consists of a DPHY, CSI-2 Rx, an
> > > > optional I2C controller and an optional Video Format Bridge (VFB). The
> > > > active lanes can be configured at run time if enabled in the IP. The
> > > > DPHY register interface may also be enabled.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Vishal Sagar <vishal.sagar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > .../bindings/media/xilinx/xlnx,csi2rxss.txt | 117
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 117 insertions(+)
> > > > create mode 100644
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/xilinx/xlnx,csi2rxss.txt
> > > >
> > > > diff --git
> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/xilinx/xlnx,csi2rxss.txt
> > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/xilinx/xlnx,csi2rxss.txt
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 0000000..31ed721
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/xilinx/xlnx,csi2rxss.txt
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
> > > > +
> > >
> > > Extra newline.
> > >
> >
> > Will remove it in next version.
> >
> > > > +Xilinx MIPI CSI2 Receiver Subsystem Device Tree Bindings
> > > > +--------------------------------------------------------
> > > > +
> > > > +The Xilinx MIPI CSI2 Receiver Subsystem is used to capture MIPI CSI2
> traffic
> > > > +from compliant camera sensors and send the output as AXI4 Stream
> video
> > > data
> > > > +for image processing.
> > > > +
> > > > +The subsystem consists of a MIPI DPHY in slave mode which captures the
> > > > +data packets. This is passed along the MIPI CSI2 Rx IP which extracts the
> > > > +packet data. This data is taken in by the Video Format Bridge (VFB),
> > > > +if selected, and converted into AXI4 Stream video data at selected
> > > > +pixels per clock as per AXI4-Stream Video IP and System Design UG934.
> > > > +
> > > > +For more details, please refer to PG232 MIPI CSI-2 Receiver Subsystem.
> > > >
> > >
> +https://www.xilinx.com/support/documentation/ip_documentation/mipi_csi
> > > 2_rx_subsystem/v3_0/pg232-mipi-csi2-rx.pdf
> > > > +
> > > > +Required properties:
> > > > +
> > > > +- compatible: Must contain "xlnx,mipi-csi2-rx-subsystem-2.0" or
> > > > + "xlnx,mipi-csi2-rx-subsystem-3.0"
> > > > +
> > > > +- reg: Physical base address and length of the registers set for the device.
> > > > +
> > > > +- interrupt-parent: specifies the phandle to the parent interrupt
> controller
> > > > +
> > > > +- interrupts: Property with a value describing the interrupt number.
> > > > +
> > > > +- xlnx,max-lanes: Maximum active lanes in the design.
> > > > +
> > > > +- xlnx,vc: Virtual Channel, specifies virtual channel number to be filtered.
> > > > + If this is 4 then all virtual channels are allowed.
> > >
> > > This seems like something a driver should configure, based on the
> > > configuration of the connected device.
> > >
> >
> > The filtering of the Virtual channels is property of the hardware IP and is fixed
> in design.
> > This is not software controlled.
>
> So... you have different IP blocks between which (one of) the difference(s)
> is the virtual channel?
>
Your understanding is correct.
The Xilinx CSI2 Rx subsystem has the 3 blocks -
1 - Xilinx CSI2 Rx controller
2 - Xilinx DPHY in Rx mode (whose register interface may be disabled/fixed configuration to reduce logic gate count).
3 - Xilinx I2C controller (used as CCI - camera control interface)
The virtual channel filtering is a property of the CSI2 Rx controller.
This was present in v1 as I wanted the IP configuration to be available for debug.
This has been removed in v2 as it is not really used in the driver.
> >
> > > > +
> > > > +- xlnx,csi-pxl-format: This denotes the CSI Data type selected in hw
> design.
> > > > + Packets other than this data type (except for RAW8 and User defined
> data
> > > > + types) will be filtered out. Possible values are RAW6, RAW7, RAW8,
> RAW10,
> > > > + RAW12, RAW14, RGB444, RGB555, RGB565, RGB666, RGB888 and
> > > YUV4228bit.
> > >
> > > This should be configured at runtime instead through V4L2 sub-device
> > > interface; it's not a property of the hardware.
> > >
> >
> > This too is a property of the hardware IP and is fixed to one data type
> > during design to reduce gate count. So for e.g. if RGB888 is selected
> > during design, then the hardware will only pass across RGB888 packet data
> > to output. (RAW8 packets are also allowed to pass through for all data
> > types selected) This is used in the driver to determine the media bus
> > format of the connected pads.
>
> If I understand this correctly, RAW8 and user defined data types will
> always pass through, plus the other data types listed here. Is that right?
Correct.
>
> >
> > > > +
> > > > +- xlnx,axis-tdata-width: AXI Stream width, This denotes the AXI Stream
> width.
> > > > + It depends on Data type chosen, Video Format Bridge enabled/disabled
> and
> > > > + pixels per clock. If VFB is disabled then its value is either 0x20 (32 bit)
> > > > + or 0x40(64 bit) width.
> > > > +
> > > > +- xlnx,video-format, xlnx,video-width: Video format and width, as defined
> in
> > > > + video.txt.
> > >
> > > Ditto.
> > >
> > Again these are fixed values and can't be changed at run time.
> > These are used to determine the media bus format.
>
> What kind of values can the xlnx,video-format property have? How about
> xlnx.video-width? Where can video.txt be found?
>
The video.txt is present at Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/xilinx/video.txt
But I have removed this from v2 as the media bus format can be derived from the CSI pixel format
as described above.
> >
> > > > +
> > > > +- port: Video port, using the DT bindings defined in ../video-interfaces.txt.
> > > > + The CSI 2 Rx Subsystem has a two ports, one input port for connecting
> to
> > > > + camera sensor and other is output port.
> > > > +
> > > > +- data-lanes: The number of data lanes through which CSI2 Rx Subsystem
> is
> > > > + connected to the camera sensor as per video-interfaces.txt
> > >
> > > This is somewhat different from the documentation in video-interfaces.txt.
> > > Could you align the two? I don't think there's a need to document standard
> > > properties in device binding files elaborately; rather just the hardware
> > > specific bits.
> > >
> >
> > Agree. In this current IP there is no way to re-order the lanes which are set at
> design time.
> > So physical and logical lanes are at same index. This could only be used to
> determine how many lanes are allowed to be programmed.
> > For e.g. if design has set the number of lanes as 4 and xlnx,en-active-lanes is
> present, then the number of lanes
> > can be set from 1 to 4.
>
> Ack.
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Sakari Ailus
> sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Regards
Vishal Sagar