Re: [PATCH 2/5] ARCv2: introduce unaligned access under a Kconfig option

[Vineet Gupta]

On 1/30/19 8:44 AM, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
>> I'd prefer to change the define of STATUS_AD_MASK itself and keep all of this
>> unchanged !
>>
> Actually I'd prefer to leave STATUS_AD_MASK untouched. Otherwise we will implicitly assign
> wrong value to STATUS_AD_MASK which is quite misleading.
>
> BTW, STATUS_AD_MASK is used in ASM code in v2 patch and it shouldn't be dependent on
> CONFIG_ARC_USE_UNALIGNED_MEM_ACCESS.

Agree !

-Vineet