[PATCH v10 13/25] arm64: daifflags: Include PMR in daifflags restore operations
From: Julien Thierry
Date: Thu Jan 31 2019 - 10:00:54 EST
The addition of PMR should not bypass the semantics of daifflags.
When DA_F are set, I bit is also set as no interrupts (even of higher
priority) is allowed.
When DA_F are cleared, I bit is cleared and interrupt enabling/disabling
goes through ICC_PMR_EL1.
Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@xxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h
index 546bc39..1dd3d7a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h
@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@
#include <linux/irqflags.h>
+#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
+
#define DAIF_PROCCTX 0
#define DAIF_PROCCTX_NOIRQ PSR_I_BIT
@@ -36,7 +38,13 @@ static inline unsigned long local_daif_save(void)
{
unsigned long flags;
- flags = arch_local_save_flags();
+ flags = read_sysreg(daif);
+
+ if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking()) {
+ /* If IRQs are masked with PMR, reflect it in the flags */
+ if (read_sysreg_s(SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1) <= GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF)
+ flags |= PSR_I_BIT;
+ }
local_daif_mask();
@@ -45,12 +53,46 @@ static inline unsigned long local_daif_save(void)
static inline void local_daif_restore(unsigned long flags)
{
- if (!arch_irqs_disabled_flags(flags))
+ bool irq_disabled = flags & PSR_I_BIT;
+
+ if (!irq_disabled) {
trace_hardirqs_on();
- arch_local_irq_restore(flags);
+ if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking())
+ arch_local_irq_enable();
+ } else if (!(flags & PSR_A_BIT)) {
+ /*
+ * If interrupts are disabled but we can take
+ * asynchronous errors, we can take NMIs
+ */
+ if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking()) {
+ flags &= ~PSR_I_BIT;
+ /*
+ * There has been concern that the write to daif
+ * might be reordered before this write to PMR.
+ * From the ARM ARM DDI 0487D.a, section D1.7.1
+ * "Accessing PSTATE fields":
+ * Writes to the PSTATE fields have side-effects on
+ * various aspects of the PE operation. All of these
+ * side-effects are guaranteed:
+ * - Not to be visible to earlier instructions in
+ * the execution stream.
+ * - To be visible to later instructions in the
+ * execution stream
+ *
+ * Also, writes to PMR are self-synchronizing, so no
+ * interrupts with a lower priority than PMR is signaled
+ * to the PE after the write.
+ *
+ * So we don't need additional synchronization here.
+ */
+ arch_local_irq_disable();
+ }
+ }
+
+ write_sysreg(flags, daif);
- if (arch_irqs_disabled_flags(flags))
+ if (irq_disabled)
trace_hardirqs_off();
}
--
1.9.1