RE: [PATCH V9 3/5] i2c: tegra: Add DMA support

[Sowjanya Komatineni]

> > 
> >> 	rx_chan = dma_request_slave_channel_reason(i2c_dev->dev, "rx");
> >> 	if (IS_ERR(rx_chan))
> >> 		return PTR_ERR(rx_chan); 
> >>
> >>
> >>> +
> >>> +	dma_chan = dma_request_slave_channel_reason(i2c_dev->dev, "tx");
> >>> +	if (IS_ERR(dma_chan)) {
> >>> +		err = PTR_ERR(dma_chan);
> >>> +		goto error;
> >>
> >> It's a good practice to release resources in opposite order to the allocation. Hence better to write this as:
> >>
> >> 		goto err_release_rx;
> >>
> >>> +	}
> >>> +
> >>> +	i2c_dev->tx_dma_chan = dma_chan;
> >>> +
> >>> +	dma_buf = dma_alloc_coherent(i2c_dev->dev,
> >>> +				     i2c_dev->dma_buf_size, &dma_phys,
> >>> +				     GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN);
> >>> +
> >>> +	if (!dma_buf) {
> >>> +		dev_err(i2c_dev->dev, "failed to allocate the DMA buffer\n");
> >>> +		err = -ENOMEM;
> >>> +		goto error;
> >>
> >> 		goto err_release_tx;
> >>
> >>> +	}
> >>> +
> >>> +	i2c_dev->dma_buf = dma_buf;
> >>> +	i2c_dev->dma_phys = dma_phys;	
>
>	i2c_dev->rx_dma_chan = rx_chan;
> >> 	i2c_dev->tx_dma_chan = tx_chan;
> >>
> >>> +	return 0;
> >>> +
> >>> +error:
> >>> +	if (i2c_dev->tx_dma_chan)
> >>> +		dma_release_channel(i2c_dev->tx_dma_chan);
> >>> +
> >>> +	if (i2c_dev->rx_dma_chan)
> >>> +		dma_release_channel(i2c_dev->rx_dma_chan); 
> >>
> >> error_release_tx:
> >> 	dma_release_channel(tx_chan);
> >> error_release_rx:
> >> 	dma_release_channel(rx_chan);
> >>
> >>> +
> >>> +	return err;
> > 
> > I am releasing resources in reverse order to allocation.
> > Trying for rx allocation followed by tx allocation During release 
> > releasing tx and then rx.
> > In case if tx allocation fails, doesnât go thru release. If rx or buf 
> > allocation fails, releases tx first and then rx
> > 
>
>
> Okay. Anyway it's a good-n-common practice to write it in the way I'm suggesting.
>
> And please set rx_chan and tx_chan after dma_buf allocation as I'm suggesting because you current variant will crash kernel since if dma_buf allocation fails, both rx and tx channels will be released and you're not setting them to NULL in that case.

OK, my wrong assumption. Thought dma_release_channel will NULL chan after its freed
Will update and send V10