Re: [PATCH V6 2/5] perf/x86/kvm: Avoid unnecessary work in guest filtering

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 04:38:27PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> +static const struct x86_cpu_desc isolation_ucodes[] = {
> +	INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE_MOBILE,	 9, 0x0000004e),
> +	INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE_MOBILE,	10, 0x0000004e),
> +	INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE_MOBILE,	11, 0x0000004e),
> +	INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE_MOBILE,	12, 0x0000004e),

> +	INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE_DESKTOP,	10, 0x0000004e),
> +	INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE_DESKTOP,	11, 0x0000004e),
> +	INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE_DESKTOP,	12, 0x0000004e),
> +	INTEL_CPU_DESC(INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE_DESKTOP,	13, 0x0000004e),

Do we want a special stepping (0 / -1) to be able to denote 'all' ?