Re: [PATCH 0/3] drivers: Frequency constraint infrastructure

From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Mon Feb 11 2019 - 00:43:44 EST

On 08-02-19, 11:35, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> At least some of the underlying mechanics seem to be very similar.
> You have priority lists, addition and removal of requests etc.
> Arguably, PM QoS may be regarded as a bit overly complicated, but
> maybe they both can use a common library underneath?

> As I said I like the idea of replacing cpufreq notifiers with
> something nicer, so if you can avoid doing almost-the-same-ting in two
> different frameworks, it would be fine by me.

Ok, will try to move to PM QoS. Thanks.