Re: [tip:x86/boot] x86/boot: Early parse RSDP and save it in boot_params
From: Ard Biesheuvel
Date: Mon Feb 11 2019 - 04:46:17 EST
On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 at 01:22, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 10:53:22PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 12:44:51PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > Yes, the kernel boots if I comment out that function and have it return 0.
> >
> > Thanks, this localizes the issue significantly.
>
> Some observations:
>
> } else {
> efi_config_table_32_t *tmp_table;
>
> tmp_table = config_tables;
> guid = tmp_table->guid; <--- *
> table = tmp_table->table;
> }
>
> It blows up at that tmp_table->guid deref above. Singlestepping through
> it with gdb shows:
>
> # arch/x86/boot/compressed/acpi.c:114: guid = tmp_table->guid;
> movq (%rdi), %rax # MEM[(struct efi_config_table_32_t *)config_tables_37].guid, guid
> movq 8(%rdi), %rsi # MEM[(struct efi_config_table_32_t *)config_tables_37].guid, guid
> # arch/x86/boot/compressed/acpi.c:115: table = tmp_table->table;
> movl 16(%rdi), %r10d # MEM[(struct efi_config_table_32_t *)config_tables_37].table, table
> jmp .L30 #
>
> and %rdi has:
>
> rdi 0x630646870
>
> which is an address above 4G but we're using a 32-bit EFI BIOS.
>
> Which begs the question whether EFI system tables can even be mapped at
> something above 4G with a 32-bit EFI and whether that could work ok.
> Hmm.
>
> Lemme add Ard and mfleming for insight here.
>
-ENOCONTEXT, but let me try in any case:
linux/efi.h has
typedef struct {
efi_guid_t guid;
u32 table;
} efi_config_table_32_t;
so if we end up with more than 32 bits set in table, there is
something seriously wrong.
The size of efi_config_table_32_t deviates from efi_config_table_64_t,
so you will have to ensure that you are using the correct stride when
iterating over config_tables.