Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm/mincore: provide mapped status when cached status is not allowed
From: Jiri Kosina
Date: Tue Feb 12 2019 - 08:09:12 EST
On Tue, 12 Feb 2019, Michal Hocko wrote:
> I would go with patch 1 for 5.1. Patches 2 still sounds controversial or
> incomplete to me.
Is it because of the disagreement what 'non-blocking' really means, or do
you see something else missing?
Merging patch just patch 1 withouth patch 2 is probably sort of useless
excercise, unfortunately.
Thanks,
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs