RE: [PATCH] ARC: Explicitly set ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN = 8
From: David Laight
Date: Tue Feb 12 2019 - 12:30:00 EST
From: Vineet Gupta
> Sent: 12 February 2019 17:17
> On 2/8/19 2:55 AM, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> > By default ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN is defined in "include/linux/slab.h" as
> > "__alignof__(unsigned long long)" which looks fine but not for ARC.
> Just for the record, the issue happens because a LLOCKD (exclusive 64-bit load)
> was trying to use a 32-bit aligned effective address (for atomic64_t), not allowed
> by ISA (LLOCKD can only take 64-bit aligned address, even when the CPU has
> unaligned access enabled).
> This in turn was happening because this word is embedded in some other struct and
> happens to be 4 byte aligned
> > ARC tools ABI sets align of "long long" the same as for "long" = 4
> > instead of 8 one may think of.
Right, but __alignof__() doesn't have to return the alignment that would
be used for a data item of the specified type.
(Read the gcc 'bug' info for gory details.)
On i386 __alignof__(long long) is 8, but structure members of type 'long long'
are 4 byte aligned and the alignment of a structure with a 'long long' member
is only 4.
(Although the microsoft compiler returns 4.)
> Right, this was indeed unexpected and not like most other arches. ARCv2 ISA allows
> regular 64-bit loads/stores (LDD/STD) to take 32-bit aligned addresses. Thus ABI
> relaxing the alignment for 64-bit data potentially causes more packing and less
> space waste. But on the flip side we need to waste space at arbitrary places liek
> So this is all good and theory, but I'm not 100% sure how slab alignment helps
> here (and is future proof). So the outer struct with embedded atomic64_t was
> allocated via slab and your patch ensures that outer struct is 64-bit aligned ?
Presumable 'atomic64_t' has an alignment attribute to force 8 byte alignment.
> But how does that guarantee that all embedded atomic64_t in there will be 64-bit
> aligned (in future say) in the light of ARC ABI and the gcc bug/feature which
> Peter alluded to
> > Thus slab allocator may easily allocate a buffer which is 32-bit aligned.
> > And most of the time it's OK until we start dealing with 64-bit atomics
> > with special LLOCKD/SCONDD instructions which (as opposed to their 32-bit
> > counterparts LLOCK/SCOND) operate with full 64-bit words but those words
> > must be 64-bit aligned.
> Some of this text needed to go above to give more context.
I suspect the slab allocator should be returning 8 byte aligned addresses
on all systems....
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)