Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] ICL support and other enhancements for PMC Core

From: Bhardwaj, Rajneesh
Date: Wed Feb 13 2019 - 13:02:40 EST

On 13-Feb-19 10:58 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 5:50 PM Bhardwaj, Rajneesh
<rajneesh.bhardwaj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 13-Feb-19 9:03 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 5:08 PM Rajneesh Bhardwaj
<rajneesh.bhardwaj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This patch series provides Icelake support for PMC Core driver and while
doing so it introduces the Icelake Mobile to intel-family.h as per the
CPUID from below Coreboot link
and provides some fixes and enhancements to the driver.
It's not applicable to my tree.
Hi Andy, I could apply and test in on latest upstream so i think its
probably because you have applied 5 patches from v1 on your tree.
You need to use latest tip of the subsystem tree always.


I sent the whole series again since referred to a wrong commit
for Fixes:. If you want to address that by rebasing then can you please
just consider patches 6-10.
We don't do rebasing for published changes. Only in rear cases when
otherwise would be worse.
Darren didn't respond to my question what he thinks about this case,
but at least it's not related to the code itself which, in my opinion,
decreases a severity.

Thanks Andy. So if i understand correctly, you are suggesting that i should ignore those patches that made to "for-next" branch already?

So should i just send a v3 comprising of remaining 5 patches and of course, addressing recent review comments?

Please let me know if there is any other issue?