[PATCH] scsi: target: move spin_lock_bh to spin_lock in tasklet

From: Zhiwei Jiang
Date: Thu Feb 14 2019 - 09:09:02 EST


as you are already in a tasklet, it is unnecessary to call
spin_lock_bh, because softirq already disable BH.

Signed-off-by: Zhiwei Jiang <qq282012236@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c
index cc9cae469c4b..29e7c51fcc4b 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi_tgt/ibmvscsi_tgt.c
@@ -3346,7 +3346,7 @@ static void ibmvscsis_handle_crq(unsigned long data)
bool ack = true;
volatile u8 valid;

- spin_lock_bh(&vscsi->intr_lock);
+ spin_lock(&vscsi->intr_lock);

dev_dbg(&vscsi->dev, "got interrupt\n");

@@ -3360,7 +3360,7 @@ static void ibmvscsis_handle_crq(unsigned long data)

dev_dbg(&vscsi->dev, "handle_crq, don't process: flags 0x%x, state 0x%hx\n",
vscsi->flags, vscsi->state);
- spin_unlock_bh(&vscsi->intr_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&vscsi->intr_lock);
return;
}

@@ -3437,7 +3437,7 @@ static void ibmvscsis_handle_crq(unsigned long data)
(int)list_empty(&vscsi->schedule_q), vscsi->flags,
vscsi->state);

- spin_unlock_bh(&vscsi->intr_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&vscsi->intr_lock);
}

static int ibmvscsis_probe(struct vio_dev *vdev,
--
2.19.0