Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: gnss: add mediatek binding
From: Loys Ollivier
Date: Fri Feb 15 2019 - 07:10:44 EST
On Thu 14 Feb 2019 at 09:11, Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 04:24:00PM +0100, Loys Ollivier wrote:
>> On Mon 11 Feb 2019 at 14:17, Loys Ollivier <lollivier@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Mon 11 Feb 2019 at 08:33, Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> Right, but please do look around for other receivers using this chipset
>> >> so that we can make the binding generic enough to cover those as well
>> >> (e.g. by choosing representative resource names).
>> > OK will have a look.
>> The only mt3339-based receivers I have found are:
>> -  Globaltop
>> -  Locosys / Pololu
>> They both only provide the UART interface and do not list the I2C/SPI
>>  https://cdn-shop.adafruit.com/datasheets/GlobalTop-FGPMMOPA6H-Datasheet-V0A.pdf
>>  https://www.pololu.com/file/0J641/LS20030~3_datasheet_v1.3.pdf
> I found tree more:
> - Globaltop PA6C
> - https://cdn-shop.adafruit.com/datasheets/GlobalTop-FGPMMOPA6C-Datasheet-V0A-Preliminary.pdf
> - Linx RM series
> - https://linxtechnologies.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/rxm-gps-rm.pdf
This is a different chip: MT3337; Apparently this chip only provides an
UART interface: https://labs.mediatek.com/en/chipset/MT3337
However it looks interesting. I'll look for a sample to test it in the
> - ublox IT530
> - https://www.u-blox.com/sites/default/files/products/documents/IT530_DataSheet_%28FTX-HW-12008%29.pdf
> All with uart-interface only and similar pins names, although the ublox
> device do have some additional features we can worry about later.
> As all but the ublox device use VBACKUP for the backup supply, do you
> mind if I change the binding to use "vbackup-supply" instead of
> "v-bckp-supply" (which is a ublox-ism) when applying?
I don't mind. You can go ahead and change the binding.
For reference, the v4 patch serie: