[PATCH v4 6/7] mtd: rawnand: ESMT: Also use the last page for bad block markers

[Schrempf Frieder]

From: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@xxxxxxxxxx>

It is known that some ESMT SLC NANDs have been shipped
with the factory bad block markers in the first or last page
of the block, instead of the first or second page. To be on
the safe side, let's check all three locations.

Signed-off-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_esmt.c | 9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_esmt.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_esmt.c
index 99a8092969a7..b37e0b5af5ae 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_esmt.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_esmt.c
@@ -36,7 +36,14 @@ static void esmt_nand_decode_id(struct nand_chip *chip)
 static int esmt_nand_init(struct nand_chip *chip)
 {
 	if (nand_is_slc(chip))
-		chip->options |= NAND_BBM_FIRSTPAGE | NAND_BBM_SECONDPAGE;
+		/*
+		 * It is known that some ESMT SLC NANDs have been shipped
+		 * with the factory bad block markers in the first or last page
+		 * of the block, instead of the first or second page. To be on
+		 * the safe side, let's check all three locations.
+		 */
+		chip->options |= NAND_BBM_FIRSTPAGE | NAND_BBM_SECONDPAGE |
+				 NAND_BBM_LASTPAGE;
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.17.1