Re: [PATCH V2 4/7] irqchip/irq-csky-mpintc: Add triger type and priority

From: Marc Zyngier
Date: Mon Feb 18 2019 - 09:41:37 EST


On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 10:04:40 +0800
guoren@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> From: Guo Ren <ren_guo@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Support 4 triger types:
> - IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH
> - IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW
> - IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING
> - IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING
>
> Support 0-255 priority setting for each irq.
>
> Changelog:
> - Fixup this_cpu_read() preempted problem.
> - Optimize the coding style.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <ren_guo@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-csky-mpintc.c | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 104 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-csky-mpintc.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-csky-mpintc.c
> index 99d3f3f..07a3752 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-csky-mpintc.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-csky-mpintc.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> #include <asm/reg_ops.h>
>
> static struct irq_domain *root_domain;
> +
> static void __iomem *INTCG_base;
> static void __iomem *INTCL_base;
>
> @@ -29,9 +30,12 @@ static void __iomem *INTCL_base;
>
> #define INTCG_ICTLR 0x0
> #define INTCG_CICFGR 0x100
> +#define INTCG_CIPRTR 0x200
> #define INTCG_CIDSTR 0x1000
>
> #define INTCL_PICTLR 0x0
> +#define INTCL_CFGR 0x14
> +#define INTCL_PRTR 0x20
> #define INTCL_SIGR 0x60
> #define INTCL_RDYIR 0x6c
> #define INTCL_SENR 0xa0
> @@ -40,6 +44,51 @@ static void __iomem *INTCL_base;
>
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(void __iomem *, intcl_reg);
>
> +static unsigned long *__trigger;
> +static unsigned long *__priority;
> +
> +#define IRQ_OFFSET(irq) ((irq < COMM_IRQ_BASE) ? irq : (irq - COMM_IRQ_BASE))
> +
> +#define TRIG_BYTE_OFFSET(i) ((((i) * 2) / 32) * 4)
> +#define TRIG_BIT_OFFSET(i) (((i) * 2) % 32)
> +
> +#define PRI_BYTE_OFFSET(i) ((((i) * 8) / 32) * 4)
> +#define PRI_BIT_OFFSET(i) (((i) * 8) % 32)
> +
> +#define TRIG_VAL(trigger, irq) (trigger << TRIG_BIT_OFFSET(IRQ_OFFSET(irq)))
> +#define TRIG_VAL_MSK(irq) (~(3 << TRIG_BIT_OFFSET(IRQ_OFFSET(irq))))
> +#define PRI_VAL(priority, irq) (priority << PRI_BIT_OFFSET(IRQ_OFFSET(irq)))
> +#define PRI_VAL_MSK(irq) (~(0xff << PRI_BIT_OFFSET(IRQ_OFFSET(irq))))
> +
> +#define TRIG_BASE(irq) \
> + (TRIG_BYTE_OFFSET(IRQ_OFFSET(irq)) + ((irq < COMM_IRQ_BASE) ? \
> + (this_cpu_read(intcl_reg) + INTCL_CFGR) : (INTCG_base + INTCG_CICFGR)))
> +
> +#define PRI_BASE(irq) \
> + (PRI_BYTE_OFFSET(IRQ_OFFSET(irq)) + ((irq < COMM_IRQ_BASE) ? \
> + (this_cpu_read(intcl_reg) + INTCL_PRTR) : (INTCG_base + INTCG_CIPRTR)))
> +
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(setup_lock);
> +static void setup_trigger_priority(unsigned long irq, unsigned long trigger,
> + unsigned long priority)
> +{
> + unsigned int tmp;
> +
> + spin_lock(&setup_lock);
> +
> + /* setup trigger */
> + tmp = readl_relaxed(TRIG_BASE(irq)) & TRIG_VAL_MSK(irq);
> +
> + writel_relaxed(tmp | TRIG_VAL(trigger, irq), TRIG_BASE(irq));
> +
> + /* setup priority */
> + tmp = readl_relaxed(PRI_BASE(irq)) & PRI_VAL_MSK(irq);
> +
> + writel_relaxed(tmp | PRI_VAL(priority, irq), PRI_BASE(irq));
> +
> + spin_unlock(&setup_lock);
> +}
> +
> static void csky_mpintc_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> void __iomem *reg_base = this_cpu_read(intcl_reg);
> @@ -52,6 +101,9 @@ static void csky_mpintc_enable(struct irq_data *d)
> {
> void __iomem *reg_base = this_cpu_read(intcl_reg);
>
> + setup_trigger_priority(d->hwirq, __trigger[d->hwirq],
> + __priority[d->hwirq]);
> +
> writel_relaxed(d->hwirq, reg_base + INTCL_SENR);
> }
>
> @@ -69,6 +121,28 @@ static void csky_mpintc_eoi(struct irq_data *d)
> writel_relaxed(d->hwirq, reg_base + INTCL_CACR);
> }
>
> +static int csky_mpintc_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
> +{
> + switch (type & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK) {
> + case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH:
> + __trigger[d->hwirq] = 0;
> + break;
> + case IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW:
> + __trigger[d->hwirq] = 1;
> + break;
> + case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING:
> + __trigger[d->hwirq] = 2;
> + break;
> + case IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING:
> + __trigger[d->hwirq] = 3;
> + break;
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> static int csky_irq_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d,
> const struct cpumask *mask_val,
> @@ -101,6 +175,7 @@ static struct irq_chip csky_irq_chip = {
> .irq_eoi = csky_mpintc_eoi,
> .irq_enable = csky_mpintc_enable,
> .irq_disable = csky_mpintc_disable,
> + .irq_set_type = csky_mpintc_set_type,
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> .irq_set_affinity = csky_irq_set_affinity,
> #endif
> @@ -121,9 +196,29 @@ static int csky_irqdomain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int csky_irq_domain_xlate_cells(struct irq_domain *d,
> + struct device_node *ctrlr, const u32 *intspec,
> + unsigned int intsize, unsigned long *out_hwirq,
> + unsigned int *out_type)
> +{
> + if (WARN_ON(intsize < 1))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + *out_hwirq = intspec[0];
> + if (intsize > 1)
> + *out_type = intspec[1] & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
> + else
> + *out_type = IRQ_TYPE_NONE;

What does IRQ_TYPE_NONE mean in this context? Shouldn't it actually be
whatever the HW defaults to? Or even better, whatever was expected in
the previous definition of the DT binding?

> +
> + if (intsize > 2)
> + __priority[*out_hwirq] = intspec[2];

And what is the used priority in this case?

> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static const struct irq_domain_ops csky_irqdomain_ops = {
> .map = csky_irqdomain_map,
> - .xlate = irq_domain_xlate_onecell,
> + .xlate = csky_irq_domain_xlate_cells,
> };
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> @@ -157,6 +252,14 @@ csky_mpintc_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent)
> if (ret < 0)
> nr_irq = INTC_IRQS;
>
> + __priority = kcalloc(nr_irq, sizeof(unsigned long), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (__priority == NULL)
> + return -ENXIO;
> +
> + __trigger = kcalloc(nr_irq, sizeof(unsigned long), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (__trigger == NULL)
> + return -ENXIO;

Maybe you should consider initializing these arrays to something that
makes sense for the case where the DT doesn't carry this information
(which is 100% of the DTs up to this point).

> +
> if (INTCG_base == NULL) {
> INTCG_base = ioremap(mfcr("cr<31, 14>"),
> INTCL_SIZE*nr_cpu_ids + INTCG_SIZE);


Not directly related to this patch: Please add a cover letter to you
patch series, and describe the goal of the whole series as well as the
changes you make along the way. It will definitely help the reviewers.

Thanks,

M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.