Re: [PATCH 01/13] arm64: mm: Add p?d_large() definitions

[Steven Price]

On 18/02/2019 15:06, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 02:29:52PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> I think that Peter means p?d_huge(x) should imply p?d_large(x), e.g.
>>
>> #define pmd_large(x) \
>> 	(pmd_sect(x) || pmd_huge(x) || pmd_trans_huge(x))
>>
>> ... which should work regardless of CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE.
> 
> Yep, that.

I'm not aware of a situation where pmd_huge(x) is true but pmd_sect(x)
isn't. Equally for pmd_huge(x) and pmd_trans_huge(x).

What am I missing?

Steve