Re: [PATCH 09/11] powercap/intel_rapl: update rapl domain name and debug messages

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Tue Feb 19 2019 - 04:10:32 EST

Next message: Arnd Bergmann: "Re: [PATCH 2/8] 32-bit userspace ABI: introduce ARCH_32BIT_OFF_T config option"
Previous message: Vlad Buslov: "Re: general protection fault in tc_ctl_chain"
In reply to: Len Brown: "[PATCH 09/11] powercap/intel_rapl: update rapl domain name and debug messages"
Next in thread: Len Brown: "[PATCH 10/11] thermal/x86_pkg_temp_thermal: Support multi-die/package"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 4:40 AM Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> The RAPL domain "name" attribute contains "Package-N",
> which is ambiguous on multi-die per-package systems.
>
> Update the name to "package-X-die-Y" on those systems.
>
> No change on systems without multi-die.
>
> Driver debug messages are also updated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c
> index e004707283da..c990eee45239 100644
> --- a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c
> +++ b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c
> @@ -178,12 +178,15 @@ struct rapl_domain {
> #define power_zone_to_rapl_domain(_zone) \
> container_of(_zone, struct rapl_domain, power_zone)
>
> +/* maximum rapl package domain name: package-%d-die-%d */
> +#define PACKAGE_DOMAIN_NAME_LENGTH 30
>
> -/* Each physical package contains multiple domains, these are the common
> +
> +/* Each rapl package contains multiple domains, these are the common
> * data across RAPL domains within a package.
> */
> struct rapl_package {
> - unsigned int id; /* physical package/socket id */
> + unsigned int id; /* logical die id, equals physical 1-die systems */
> unsigned int nr_domains;
> unsigned long domain_map; /* bit map of active domains */
> unsigned int power_unit;
> @@ -198,6 +201,7 @@ struct rapl_package {
> int lead_cpu; /* one active cpu per package for access */
> /* Track active cpus */
> struct cpumask cpumask;
> + char name[PACKAGE_DOMAIN_NAME_LENGTH];
> };
>
> struct rapl_defaults {
> @@ -926,8 +930,8 @@ static int rapl_check_unit_core(struct rapl_package *rp, int cpu)
> value = (msr_val & TIME_UNIT_MASK) >> TIME_UNIT_OFFSET;
> rp->time_unit = 1000000 / (1 << value);
>
> - pr_debug("Core CPU package %d energy=%dpJ, time=%dus, power=%duW\n",
> - rp->id, rp->energy_unit, rp->time_unit, rp->power_unit);
> + pr_debug("Core CPU %s energy=%dpJ, time=%dus, power=%duW\n",
> + rp->name, rp->energy_unit, rp->time_unit, rp->power_unit);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -951,8 +955,8 @@ static int rapl_check_unit_atom(struct rapl_package *rp, int cpu)
> value = (msr_val & TIME_UNIT_MASK) >> TIME_UNIT_OFFSET;
> rp->time_unit = 1000000 / (1 << value);
>
> - pr_debug("Atom package %d energy=%dpJ, time=%dus, power=%duW\n",
> - rp->id, rp->energy_unit, rp->time_unit, rp->power_unit);
> + pr_debug("Atom %s energy=%dpJ, time=%dus, power=%duW\n",
> + rp->name, rp->energy_unit, rp->time_unit, rp->power_unit);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -1179,7 +1183,7 @@ static void rapl_update_domain_data(struct rapl_package *rp)
> u64 val;
>
> for (dmn = 0; dmn < rp->nr_domains; dmn++) {
> - pr_debug("update package %d domain %s data\n", rp->id,
> + pr_debug("update %s domain %s data\n", rp->name,
> rp->domains[dmn].name);
> /* exclude non-raw primitives */
> for (prim = 0; prim < NR_RAW_PRIMITIVES; prim++) {
> @@ -1204,7 +1208,6 @@ static void rapl_unregister_powercap(void)
> static int rapl_package_register_powercap(struct rapl_package *rp)
> {
> struct rapl_domain *rd;
> - char dev_name[17]; /* max domain name = 7 + 1 + 8 for int + 1 for null*/
> struct powercap_zone *power_zone = NULL;
> int nr_pl, ret;
>
> @@ -1215,20 +1218,16 @@ static int rapl_package_register_powercap(struct rapl_package *rp)
> for (rd = rp->domains; rd < rp->domains + rp->nr_domains; rd++) {
> if (rd->id == RAPL_DOMAIN_PACKAGE) {
> nr_pl = find_nr_power_limit(rd);
> - pr_debug("register socket %d package domain %s\n",
> - rp->id, rd->name);
> - memset(dev_name, 0, sizeof(dev_name));
> - snprintf(dev_name, sizeof(dev_name), "%s-%d",
> - rd->name, rp->id);
> + pr_debug("register package domain %s\n", rp->name);
> power_zone = powercap_register_zone(&rd->power_zone,
> control_type,
> - dev_name, NULL,
> + rp->name, NULL,
> &zone_ops[rd->id],
> nr_pl,
> &constraint_ops);
> if (IS_ERR(power_zone)) {
> - pr_debug("failed to register package, %d\n",
> - rp->id);
> + pr_debug("failed to register power zone %s\n",
> + rp->name);
> return PTR_ERR(power_zone);
> }
> /* track parent zone in per package/socket data */
> @@ -1254,8 +1253,8 @@ static int rapl_package_register_powercap(struct rapl_package *rp)
> &constraint_ops);
>
> if (IS_ERR(power_zone)) {
> - pr_debug("failed to register power_zone, %d:%s:%s\n",
> - rp->id, rd->name, dev_name);
> + pr_debug("failed to register power_zone, %s:%s\n",
> + rp->name, rd->name);
> ret = PTR_ERR(power_zone);
> goto err_cleanup;
> }
> @@ -1268,7 +1267,7 @@ static int rapl_package_register_powercap(struct rapl_package *rp)
> * failed after the first domain setup.
> */
> while (--rd >= rp->domains) {
> - pr_debug("unregister package %d domain %s\n", rp->id, rd->name);
> + pr_debug("unregister %s domain %s\n", rp->name, rd->name);
> powercap_unregister_zone(control_type, &rd->power_zone);
> }
>
> @@ -1378,8 +1377,8 @@ static void rapl_detect_powerlimit(struct rapl_domain *rd)
> /* check if the domain is locked by BIOS, ignore if MSR doesn't exist */
> if (!rapl_read_data_raw(rd, FW_LOCK, false, &val64)) {
> if (val64) {
> - pr_info("RAPL package %d domain %s locked by BIOS\n",
> - rd->rp->id, rd->name);
> + pr_info("RAPL %s domain %s locked by BIOS\n",
> + rd->rp->name, rd->name);
> rd->state |= DOMAIN_STATE_BIOS_LOCKED;
> }
> }
> @@ -1408,10 +1407,10 @@ static int rapl_detect_domains(struct rapl_package *rp, int cpu)
> }
> rp->nr_domains = bitmap_weight(&rp->domain_map, RAPL_DOMAIN_MAX);
> if (!rp->nr_domains) {
> - pr_debug("no valid rapl domains found in package %d\n", rp->id);
> + pr_debug("no valid rapl domains found in %s\n", rp->name);
> return -ENODEV;
> }
> - pr_debug("found %d domains on package %d\n", rp->nr_domains, rp->id);
> + pr_debug("found %d domains on %s\n", rp->nr_domains, rp->name);
>
> rp->domains = kcalloc(rp->nr_domains + 1, sizeof(struct rapl_domain),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -1444,8 +1443,8 @@ static void rapl_remove_package(struct rapl_package *rp)
> rd_package = rd;
> continue;
> }
> - pr_debug("remove package, undo power limit on %d: %s\n",
> - rp->id, rd->name);
> + pr_debug("remove package, undo power limit on %s: %s\n",
> + rp->name, rd->name);
> powercap_unregister_zone(control_type, &rd->power_zone);
> }
> /* do parent zone last */
> @@ -1459,6 +1458,7 @@ static struct rapl_package *rapl_add_package(int cpu)
> {
> int id = topology_unique_die_id(cpu);
> struct rapl_package *rp;
> + struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
> int ret;
>
> rp = kzalloc(sizeof(struct rapl_package), GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -1469,6 +1469,13 @@ static struct rapl_package *rapl_add_package(int cpu)
> rp->id = id;
> rp->lead_cpu = cpu;
>
> + if (c->x86_max_dies > 1)
> + snprintf(rp->name, PACKAGE_DOMAIN_NAME_LENGTH,
> + "package-%d-die-%d", c->phys_proc_id, c->cpu_die_id);
> + else
> + snprintf(rp->name, PACKAGE_DOMAIN_NAME_LENGTH, "package-%d",
> + c->phys_proc_id);
> +
> /* check if the package contains valid domains */
> if (rapl_detect_domains(rp, cpu) ||
> rapl_defaults->check_unit(rp, cpu)) {
> --
> 2.18.0-rc0
>

Next message: Arnd Bergmann: "Re: [PATCH 2/8] 32-bit userspace ABI: introduce ARCH_32BIT_OFF_T config option"
Previous message: Vlad Buslov: "Re: general protection fault in tc_ctl_chain"
In reply to: Len Brown: "[PATCH 09/11] powercap/intel_rapl: update rapl domain name and debug messages"
Next in thread: Len Brown: "[PATCH 10/11] thermal/x86_pkg_temp_thermal: Support multi-die/package"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]