Re: [RFC PATCH] scsi: fix oops in scsi_uninit_cmd()
From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Wed Feb 20 2019 - 10:18:47 EST
[fullquote removed, please follow proper mail etiquette]
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 08:56:28AM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> regression in the SCSI sd driver due to the switch from the legacy block
> layer to scsi-mq. The above patch introduces two atomic operations in the
> hot path and hence would introduce a performance regression. I think this
> can be avoided by making sure that sd_uninit_command() gets called before
> the request tag is freed. What changes would be required to make the block
> layer core call sd_uninit_command() before the request tag is freed? Would
> introducing prep_rq_fn and unprep_rq_fn callbacks in struct blk_mq_ops and
> making sure that the SCSI core sets these callback function pointers
> appropriately be sufficient? Would such a change allow to simplify the NVMe
> initiator driver? Are there any alternatives to this approach that are more
> elegant?
Additional indirect calls in the I/O fast path is something I'd rather
avoid. But I don't fully understand the problem yet - where do
we release a disk reference from blk_update_request? And why can't
we move that release to __blk_mq_end_request?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.
---end quoted text---