Re: [PATCH 4/6] lib/string: Add string copy/zero function
From: Andy Shevchenko
Date: Thu Feb 21 2019 - 07:03:12 EST
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 2:49 AM Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 3:24 PM Tobin C. Harding <tobin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > We have a function to copy strings safely and we have a function to copy
> > strings _and_ zero the tail of the destination (if source string is
> > shorter than destination buffer) but we do not have a function to do
> > both at once. This means developers must write this themselves if they
> > desire this functionality. This is a chore, and also leaves us open to
> > off by one errors unnecessarily.
> >
> > Add a function that calls strscpy() then memset()s the tail to zero if
> > the source string is shorter than the destination buffer.
> > +/* Wrapper function, no arch specific code required */
> > +ssize_t strscpy_zeroed(char *dest, const char *src, size_t count);
>
> bikeshed: I think "pad" is shorter and more descriptive. How about
> something like strspad() strscpy_pad() or strscpy_zero()? (just to
> shorten it slightly)
zero / zeroed examples in the kernel have semantics of getting some
area completely zeroed. OTOH pad means different and we have examples
as well (see seq_pad() as one).
So, I would definitely vote for _pad b/c of semantics.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko