Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] kprobe: Do not use uaccess functions to access kernel memory that can fault

[Andy Lutomirski]

> On Feb 22, 2019, at 10:28 AM, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 9:48 AM Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Feb 22, 2019, at 9:43 AM, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Then we should still probably fix up "__probe_kernel_read()" to not
>>> allow user accesses. The easiest way to do that is actually likely to
>>> use the "unsafe_get_user()" functions *without* doing a
>>> uaccess_begin(), which will mean that modern CPU's will simply fault
>>> on a kernel access to user space.
>>> 
>>> The nice thing about that is that usually developers will have access
>>> to exactly those modern boxes, so the people who notice that it
>>> doesn't work are the right people.
>> 
>> We use probe_kernel_read() from oops code. Iâd rather it return -EFAULT than oops harder and kill the first oops.
> 
> It would still do that.
> 
> Using the unsafe_get_user() macros doesn't remove the exception
> handling, and we wouldn't remove the whole "pagefault_disable()"
> either. So it would work exactly the same way it does now, except on a
> modern CPU it would return -EFAULT for a user space access due to AC
> not being set.
> 
> 

Hmm. I misunderstood you. I thought you wanted the oops.

Weâd have to check that we donât trip the âSMAP violation, egads!â check.