Re: [PATCH RT 4/2] hrtimer: Don't lose state in cpu_chill()
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Date: Mon Feb 25 2019 - 11:34:46 EST
On 2019-02-25 15:43:35 [+0100], Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
Hi Mike,
> My box claims that this patch is busted. It argues its case by IO
> deadlocking any kernel this patch is applied to when spinning rust is
> flogged, including virgin 4.19-rt14, said kernel becoming stable again
> when I whack the accused.
does the following hunk make any difference?
diff --git a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
index 6ecdb9469ca9..e154632b90b4 100644
--- a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
@@ -1884,20 +1884,29 @@ COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE2(nanosleep, struct old_timespec32 __user *, rqtp,
*/
void cpu_chill(void)
{
+ struct task_struct *self = current;
ktime_t chill_time;
unsigned int freeze_flag = current->flags & PF_NOFREEZE;
- long saved_state;
- saved_state = current->state;
- chill_time = ktime_set(0, NSEC_PER_MSEC);
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&self->pi_lock);
+ WARN_ON(self->saved_state != TASK_RUNNING);
+ self->saved_state = self->state;
__set_current_state_no_track(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&self->pi_lock);
+
+ chill_time = ktime_set(0, NSEC_PER_MSEC);
+
current->flags |= PF_NOFREEZE;
sleeping_lock_inc();
schedule_hrtimeout(&chill_time, HRTIMER_MODE_REL_HARD);
sleeping_lock_dec();
if (!freeze_flag)
current->flags &= ~PF_NOFREEZE;
- __set_current_state_no_track(saved_state);
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&self->pi_lock);
+ __set_current_state_no_track(self->saved_state);
+ self->saved_state = TASK_RUNNING;
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&self->pi_lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_chill);
#endif
Sebastian