[PATCH 4.20 025/183] mfd: twl-core: Fix section annotations on {,un}protect_pm_master
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Mon Feb 25 2019 - 16:31:02 EST
4.20-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
[ Upstream commit 8838555089f0345b87f4277fe5a8dd647dc65589 ]
When building the kernel with Clang, the following section mismatch
warning appears:
WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x3d84a3b): Section mismatch in reference from
the function twl_probe() to the function
.init.text:unprotect_pm_master()
The function twl_probe() references
the function __init unprotect_pm_master().
This is often because twl_probe lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of unprotect_pm_master is wrong.
Remove the __init annotation on the *protect_pm_master functions so
there is no more mismatch.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/mfd/twl-core.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c b/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c
index 4be3d239da9ec..299016bc46d90 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c
@@ -979,7 +979,7 @@ add_children(struct twl4030_platform_data *pdata, unsigned irq_base,
* letting it generate the right frequencies for USB, MADC, and
* other purposes.
*/
-static inline int __init protect_pm_master(void)
+static inline int protect_pm_master(void)
{
int e = 0;
@@ -988,7 +988,7 @@ static inline int __init protect_pm_master(void)
return e;
}
-static inline int __init unprotect_pm_master(void)
+static inline int unprotect_pm_master(void)
{
int e = 0;
--
2.19.1