Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: tegra: enforce PM requirement

[Sameer Pujar]

On 2/26/2019 8:16 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 26.02.2019 11:25, Sameer Pujar ÐÐÑÐÑ:
> > The requirement for this came while adding runtime PM support for HDA
> > driver. There were concerns about driver explicitly handling !PM case.
> > In general, drivers need to handle !PM case with work arounds for
> > managing clocks and power explicitly, which is not really necessary
> > when PM support on tegra is in good shape. In fact ARM 64-bit Tegra
> > platforms enforce PM support and there is no reason why this cannot be
> > done for 32-bit.
> >
> > More details with regards to above can be found in following patch,
> > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1036645/
> I think you meant this: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1031007/
my bad! Thanks for pointing.