Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] tracing/probe: Support user-space dereference

From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Wed Feb 27 2019 - 21:42:51 EST


On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 23:44:42 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c
> index a7012de37a00..0efef172db17 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_probe.c
> @@ -239,6 +239,7 @@ parse_probe_arg(char *arg, const struct fetch_type *type,
> {
> struct fetch_insn *code = *pcode;
> unsigned long param;
> + int deref = FETCH_OP_DEREF;
> long offset = 0;
> char *tmp;
> int ret = 0;
> @@ -301,8 +302,17 @@ parse_probe_arg(char *arg, const struct fetch_type *type,
> break;
>
> case '+': /* deref memory */
> - arg++; /* Skip '+', because kstrtol() rejects it. */
> case '-':
> + if (arg[0] == '+') {
> + arg++; /* Skip '+', because kstrtol() rejects it. */
> + if (arg[0] == 'u') {
> + deref = FETCH_OP_UDEREF;
> + arg++;
> + }
> + } else if (arg[1] == 'u') { /* Start with "-u" */
> + deref = FETCH_OP_UDEREF;
> + *(++arg) = '-';
> + }

What about:

if (arg[1] == 'u') {
deref = FETCH_OP_UDEREF;
arg[1] = arg[0];
arg++;
}
if (arg[0] == '+')
arg++; /* Skip '+', because kstrtol() rejects it. */

A bit less messy.


> tmp = strchr(arg, '(');
> if (!tmp)
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -328,7 +338,7 @@ parse_probe_arg(char *arg, const struct fetch_type *type,
> return -E2BIG;
> *pcode = code;
>
> - code->op = FETCH_OP_DEREF;
> + code->op = deref;
> code->offset = offset;
> }
> break;
> @@ -444,13 +454,14 @@ static int traceprobe_parse_probe_arg_body(char *arg, ssize_t *size,
> /* Store operation */
> if (!strcmp(parg->type->name, "string") ||
> !strcmp(parg->type->name, "ustring")) {
> - if (code->op != FETCH_OP_DEREF && code->op != FETCH_OP_IMM &&
> - code->op != FETCH_OP_COMM) {
> + if (code->op != FETCH_OP_DEREF && code->op != FETCH_OP_UDEREF
> + && code->op != FETCH_OP_IMM && code->op != FETCH_OP_COMM) {
> pr_info("string only accepts memory or address.\n");
> ret = -EINVAL;
> goto fail;
> }
> - if (code->op != FETCH_OP_DEREF || parg->count) {
> + if ((code->op == FETCH_OP_IMM && code->op == FETCH_OP_COMM)
> + || parg->count) {

How would "code->op == FETCH_OP_IMM && code->op == FETCH_OP_COMM" ever be true?

Did you mean || ?

-- Steve

> /*
> * IMM and COMM is pointing actual address, those must
> * be kept, and if parg->count != 0, this is an array
> @@ -463,7 +474,8 @@ static int traceprobe_parse_probe_arg_body(char *arg, ssize_t *size,
> }
> }
> /* If op == DEREF, replace it with STRING */
> - if (!strcmp(parg->type->name, "ustring"))
> + if (!strcmp(parg->type->name, "ustring") ||
> + code->op == FETCH_OP_UDEREF)
> code->op = FETCH_OP_ST_USTRING;
> else
> code->op = FETCH_OP_ST_STRING;