Re: [PATCH net-next 3/6] net: 8021q: vlan_dev: add vid tag for vlan device own address

From: Florian Fainelli
Date: Wed Feb 27 2019 - 23:13:48 EST




On 2/26/2019 10:45 AM, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
> The vlan device address is held separately from uc/mc lists and
> handled differently. The vlan dev address is bound with real device
> address only if it's inherited from init, in all other cases it's
> separate address entry in uc list. With vid set, the address becomes
> not inherited from real device after it's set manually as before, but
> is part of uc list any way, with appropriate vid tag set. If vid_len
> for real device is 0, the behaviour is the same as before this change,
> so shouldn't be any impact on systems w/o individual virtual device
> filtering (IVDF) enabled. This allows to control and sync vlan device
> address and disable concrete vlan packet income when vlan interface is
> down.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

[snip]

>
> +static int vlan_dev_add_addr(struct net_device *dev, u8 *addr)
> +{
> + struct net_device *real_dev = vlan_dev_real_dev(dev);
> + unsigned char naddr[ETH_ALEN + NET_8021Q_VID_TSIZE];
> +
> + if (real_dev->vid_len) {

Don't you need to check that real_dev->vid_len is >= NET_8021Q_VID_TSIZE
here?

> + memcpy(naddr, addr, dev->addr_len);
> + vlan_dev_set_addr_vid(dev, naddr);
> + return dev_vid_uc_add(real_dev, naddr);
> + }
> +
> + if (ether_addr_equal(addr, real_dev->dev_addr))
> + return 0;
> +
> + return dev_uc_add(real_dev, addr);
> +}
> +
> +static void vlan_dev_del_addr(struct net_device *dev, u8 *addr)
> +{
> + struct net_device *real_dev = vlan_dev_real_dev(dev);
> + unsigned char naddr[ETH_ALEN + NET_8021Q_VID_TSIZE];
> +
> + if (real_dev->vid_len) {

Same here.

> + memcpy(naddr, addr, dev->addr_len);
> + vlan_dev_set_addr_vid(dev, naddr);
> + dev_vid_uc_del(real_dev, naddr);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (!ether_addr_equal(dev->dev_addr, real_dev->dev_addr))
> + dev_uc_del(real_dev, addr);
> +}
> +
> +static int vlan_dev_subs_addr(struct net_device *dev, u8 *addr)
> +{
> + int err;
> +
> + err = vlan_dev_add_addr(dev, addr);
> + if (err < 0)
> + return err;
> +
> + vlan_dev_del_addr(dev, dev->dev_addr);
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> bool vlan_dev_inherit_address(struct net_device *dev,
> struct net_device *real_dev)
> {
> if (dev->addr_assign_type != NET_ADDR_STOLEN)
> return false;
>
> + if (real_dev->vid_len)
> + if (vlan_dev_subs_addr(dev, real_dev->dev_addr))
> + return false;

The check on real_dev->vid_len can be absorbed into vlan_dev_subs_addr()?

> +
> ether_addr_copy(dev->dev_addr, real_dev->dev_addr);
> call_netdevice_notifiers(NETDEV_CHANGEADDR, dev);
> return true;
> @@ -278,9 +327,10 @@ static int vlan_dev_open(struct net_device *dev)
> !(vlan->flags & VLAN_FLAG_LOOSE_BINDING))
> return -ENETDOWN;
>
> - if (!ether_addr_equal(dev->dev_addr, real_dev->dev_addr) &&
> - !vlan_dev_inherit_address(dev, real_dev)) {
> - err = dev_uc_add(real_dev, dev->dev_addr);
> + if (ether_addr_equal(dev->dev_addr, real_dev->dev_addr) ||
> + (!ether_addr_equal(dev->dev_addr, real_dev->dev_addr) &&
> + !vlan_dev_inherit_address(dev, real_dev))) {

Should this condition simply become if !vlan_dev_inherit_address() now?
--
Florian