RE: [v6 1/3] dt-bindings: ahci-fsl-qoriq: add lx2160a chip name to the list

[Peng Ma]

Hi Rob,

Thanks for your comments, I don't understand what you said.
This patch is one of the series patchs(http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-ide/list/?series=93099&archive=both&state=*) for review.
There is not changed for 6th version of this patch.

Best Regards,
Peng

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: 2019年2月22日 22:40
>To: Peng Ma <peng.ma@xxxxxxx>
>Cc: axboe@xxxxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; mark.rutland@xxxxxxx;
>shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx; Leo Li <leoyang.li@xxxxxxx>; Andy Tang
><andy.tang@xxxxxxx>; linux-ide@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Mian
>Yousaf Kaukab <yousaf.kaukab@xxxxxxxx>; Peng Ma <peng.ma@xxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: [v6 1/3] dt-bindings: ahci-fsl-qoriq: add lx2160a chip name to the
>list
>
>On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 08:56:05 +0000, Peng Ma wrote:
>> Add lx2160a compatible to bindings documentation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peng Ma <peng.ma@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> changed for V6:
>> 	- no changed
>>
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/ata/ahci-fsl-qoriq.txt     |    2 +-
>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>
>Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
>there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
>maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
>
>If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.