Re: [PATCHv7 00/10] Heterogenous memory node attributes
From: Jonathan Cameron
Date: Mon Mar 11 2019 - 07:48:01 EST
On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 15:50:28 -0700
Keith Busch <keith.busch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> == Changes since v6 ==
>
> Updated to linux-next, which has a change to the HMAT structures to
> account for ACPI revision 6.3.
>
> Changed memory-side cache "associativity" attribute to "indexing"
>
>
> Regarding the Kconfig, I am having the implementation specific as a user
> selectable option, and the generic interface, HMEM_REPORTING, is not a
> user prompt. I just wanted to clarify the point that there's only one.
>
>
> == Background ==
>
> Platforms may provide multiple types of cpu attached system memory. The
> memory ranges for each type may have different characteristics that
> applications may wish to know about when considering what node they want
> their memory allocated from.
>
> It had previously been difficult to describe these setups as memory
> rangers were generally lumped into the NUMA node of the CPUs. New
> platform attributes have been created and in use today that describe
> the more complex memory hierarchies that can be created.
>
> This series' objective is to provide the attributes from such systems
> that are useful for applications to know about, and readily usable with
> existing tools and libraries. Those applications may query performance
> attributes relative to a particular CPU they're running on in order to
> make more informed choices for where they want to allocate hot and cold
> data. This works with mbind() or the numactl library.
Hi Keith,
Great to see this 'nearly' good to go.
For those that were too small / trivial to deserve a reviewed-by
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject to that one tweak in patch 7,
Tested-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>
Note that my tests were very limited for the memory-side caches
and not exactly comprehensive for the access attributes either.
They focused on the cases I care about rather than putting together
a fuller test suite. That is probably worth doing at some point though
not sure I'll get to it any time soon.
Thanks,
Jonathan
>
> Keith Busch (10):
> acpi: Create subtable parsing infrastructure
> acpi: Add HMAT to generic parsing tables
> acpi/hmat: Parse and report heterogeneous memory
> node: Link memory nodes to their compute nodes
> node: Add heterogenous memory access attributes
> node: Add memory-side caching attributes
> acpi/hmat: Register processor domain to its memory
> acpi/hmat: Register performance attributes
> acpi/hmat: Register memory side cache attributes
> doc/mm: New documentation for memory performance
>
> Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-devices-node | 87 +++-
> Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst | 164 +++++++
> arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 4 +-
> arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c | 14 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c | 36 +-
> drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/acpi/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/acpi/hmat/Kconfig | 11 +
> drivers/acpi/hmat/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/acpi/hmat/hmat.c | 670 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/acpi/numa.c | 16 +-
> drivers/acpi/scan.c | 4 +-
> drivers/acpi/tables.c | 76 ++-
> drivers/base/Kconfig | 8 +
> drivers/base/node.c | 352 +++++++++++++-
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v2m.c | 2 +-
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its-pci-msi.c | 2 +-
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its-platform-msi.c | 2 +-
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 6 +-
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 10 +-
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 4 +-
> drivers/mailbox/pcc.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/acpi.h | 6 +-
> include/linux/node.h | 72 ++-
> 25 files changed, 1487 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numaperf.rst
> create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/hmat/Kconfig
> create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/hmat/Makefile
> create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/hmat/hmat.c
>